Thursday, May 2, 2013

Another Holder diktat that likely will eventually be tested at the muzzle.

"'UNCONSTITUTIONAL'? Let's test that theory, Eric."
"U.S. attorney general tells Brownback new gun law is unconstitutional."

8 comments:

Anonymous said...

Cool picture Mike

Anonymous said...

With so many states passing so many laws on essentially that issue, I guess we'll find out really soon.

If One of the states actually DID interfere with FLEAs doing their unconstitutional jobs, what's Holder going to do? Send in Federal troops?Dear Leader would have to give THAT order and THAT would require serious stones. To the best of my recollection Dear Leader has never even evidenced HAVING stones - much less the kind it would take to give such an order. Remember how verified use of chemical weapons was to have been a "red line" for Syria?

Gonna get interesting, people. Gonna get REAL INTERESTING REAL SOON!

BTW, my money's on Kansas and Bama and Missouri and all the other states who have passed such laws.

Anonymous said...

'The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.'

Nowhere in the constitution do I see anything allowing gov to restrict rights . I believe the intent of the constitution was to put chains on the gov so they couldn't restrict our rights .

Holder definetly uses very circular logic to support his agenda

Anonymous said...

Holder has learnt a new word - probably from hearing it so much in relation to his actions.

Doesn't know what it means ... yet!

We gonna have to learn him soon.

III

SWIFT said...

I suppose Kansas, Missouri or Alabama are as good a place for this thing to go hot as anywhere. I hate long drives, but you play the hand that was dealt.

Anonymous said...

Lots of hogs in Kansas...looks like Holder doesn't understand that his actions will end up fattening them up somewhat.

Anonymous said...

Restricting government is UN-Constitutional? Classic statist crap.

Anonymous said...

Unconstitutional?

Fancy word for a guy who's boss isn't even eligible to hold his position (because his father wasn't a citizen when he was born, NOT because of the Hawaii birth certificate nonsense). Hell, EVERY law that Obama signed, and every appointment he made - including that of Holder himself - is UNCONSTITUTIONAL!

Holder, GFY!