Thursday, March 7, 2013

Dictatorship or simulatorship -- it can only end in violence.

Karl Denninger comments on our "Our Disintegrating Government."
The Rule of Law works and guides a just society only because it applies to everyone.
Nobody gets to rape, rob, pillage or murder. If you do, no matter who you are, you face the same punishment, the same process, the same sentence.
We all know there are disparities in the process and always have been. But there's a difference between the foibles of mankind -- everyone has their bias, and there is no such thing as a human process that is flawless -- and intentional, designed-in or willful refusal to prosecute certain people for acts that land others in prison.
The latter is the defining action of a dictatorship.
A dictatorship can only exist by declaring war upon the people. When a certain subset of the population is given license to pillage or worse that is the very definition of "diktat" from which the term "dictatorship" comes.
Fast and Furious, incidentally, falls into this category as well.
This is an extraordinarily dangerous state of affairs and must not be permitted to continue. The government and its actors have lost all moral and ethical appeal to fair play and the rule of law -- by exempting certain people they have declared both themselves and those they exempted beyond the protections that exist in a civilized society.
I doubt Eric Holder realizes what happened in that hearing room or how clearly he rang the bell, but there is now a gauntlet before both the Administration and Congress that they have laid at their own feet. Coupled with Rand Paul's filibuster over one simple question -- the murder of non-belligerent Americans on American soil without due process of law, without charge, without trial, we have a truly historical pair of events -- and unfortunately they're not the sort of historical events you wish to witness.
Vox Day reacts in "Too big to jail."
I wouldn't call the present system a dictatorship myself. Dictatorships are more open and direct. It is better described as a simulatorship, which is to say, rule by pretense. It is reminiscent of the latter days of the Soviet empire, when the Russian people pretended to work and the Soviet government pretended to pay them. In the latter days of the US empire, the federal government pretends its actions are within the limits set by the U.S. Constitution and the American people pretend to believe them.
It matters not what you call it, dictatorship or simulatorship -- it can only end in violence, for neither regime type can stand armed civil disobedience and that is where we are heading.

3 comments:

SWIFT said...

"It can only end in violence". As it should. The double standard of Just-Us, has stood long enough. Everyone, including Congress, the Judiciary and State Houses have recognized the problem and do nothing. I attended a town hall meeting Tuesday night with our state legislator. Getting them to commit to, or do anything, other than raise taxes and pursue unworkable green energy, is impossible. I can't wait for the: "Oh gee, we had no idea you'ns were so pissed off".

Anonymous said...

You can only write so many letters and make so many phone calls.
I always say: You nor any other man has the power to limit or eliminate my unalienable rights enumerated in the Bill of Rights.
I and 3 million others will fight you to the death to preserve and defend the Constitution.
Don't get cockey; we are highly trained in insurgent warfare.
Just so we understand each other.
III/0317

Paul X said...

"The Rule of Law works and guides a just society only because it applies to everyone."

I don't believe there was ever such a place. It's always been a rigged game. The only question has been, rigged to what extent?