The ORIGINAL gathering place for a merry band of Three Percenters. (As denounced by Bill Clinton on CNN!)
In Common use is not a threat. I agree, there is an attempt to fabricate a difference between first and second amendment case law, even now within strict scrutiny, but it is impossible. Maybe lower courts fail to understand the big picture - but SCOTUS does not. There is FAR FAR FAR too much case law STRUCTURE at risk to go along with this in common use as SCOPE. Scalia really ribbed the grabbers here. Just as he explained that A Well Regulated Militia being Necessary to the Security of a Free State was A reason, not THE reason, much less the ONLY reason, In Common Use is A reason, not THE reason, much less the ONLY reason. In Common Use is a BUST.
Post a Comment