Monday, May 5, 2014

Punishing 'smart gun' Quislings already yielding potential policy rewards

Absent the threat of a legal requirement that guns be "smart," gun rights advocates have no reason to fear further development of the technology (although removing that threat would presumably not neutralize some anti-gunners' rather odd objections to it). If some slow-learning gun shop owners have to be forced out of business to remove that threat, that's an acceptable price.

2 comments:

sdharms said...

too many negatives in that sentence. I cant understand it.

Shawn McEwen said...

I already own some of these "smart guns" and they're great. I don't need a magic watch either, just a computer controlled finger... which I might add is controlled by the most sophisticated super-computer in the world, the human mind! Holy crap, it works every time too!

On another note, if Loretta Weinberg were to hold the same gun in her hands, it would become a "Dumb-Ass-loser-bitch-gun" immediately. Funny thing, that.