Wednesday, October 5, 2011

"So, please, Chairman Smith: put a sock in it. . . . But we don't need no stinkin' Special Prosecutor."


"Prosecutor? Prosecutor?!? We don' need no steenkeeng pro-see-cue-tor!"

Let it bleed.

3 comments:

J. Croft said...

Yeah, let that bleed!

Important non sequeteur; Charles Dyer gets new trial date, a real attorney but still needs money.

Details HERE: http://freedomguide.blogspot.com/2011/10/dyer-gets-new-attorney-new-trial-date.html

millerized said...

Either let it bleed, or we open more wounds.
Ones that medical attention or political band-aids won't seal.

Anonymous said...

"Let it bleed, I say."

Agreed.

If it bleeds, it leads.

Maintaining a cover-up when it becomes front page news is a hopeless task.

This implies the administration's next move is to select a scapegoat and selectively provide Congressional investigators with a document dump of incriminating evidence.

MALTHUS