Judge Gohmert is our congressman. He'll roast Holder over an open flame with an apple in his mouth and a carrot stuck up the other end. Wrong person for the AG to try to bully!
Rep. Gohmert obviously pissed off that corrupt bastard Holder. But Holder can be counted on, to have the equally corrupt FBI, try a sting on Gohmert, or at least put Gohmert's every move under surveillance. He won't be able to fart without Holder knowing about it. I would not put it past them to bug his office. Or, more likely, the FBI already has one of Gohmert's staff on the payroll. Try to remember that these are the "good guys".
Holder was found in contempt of congress. They should lock his ass up for a while.
In 1821, the Supreme Court upheld Congress’s right to hold people in contempt and imprison them. Without this power, the court ruled, Congress would “be exposed to every indignity and interruption, that rudeness, caprice, or even conspiracy, may mediate against it.”
They have the power and the have their own jail. Have the Sgt at Arms detain him until he produces the documents they want.
@Robert Fowler, I read a couple years ago, that Congress did away with the jail. They turned it into office space or the like. When I read the article, I saw it as a giant white flag.
13 comments:
Judge Gohmert is our congressman. He'll roast Holder over an open flame with an apple in his mouth and a carrot stuck up the other end. Wrong person for the AG to try to bully!
Rep. Gohmert obviously pissed off that corrupt bastard Holder. But Holder can be counted on, to have the equally corrupt FBI, try a sting on Gohmert, or at least put Gohmert's every move under surveillance. He won't be able to fart without Holder knowing about it. I would not put it past them to bug his office. Or, more likely, the FBI already has one of Gohmert's staff on the payroll. Try to remember that these are the "good guys".
I'm so sorry. That was inaccurate. I meant to say "Arrogant, Piece of Crap RAT bastard."
Holder was found in contempt of congress. They should lock his ass up for a while.
In 1821, the Supreme Court upheld Congress’s right to hold people in contempt and imprison them. Without this power, the court ruled, Congress would “be exposed to every indignity and interruption, that rudeness, caprice, or even conspiracy, may mediate against it.”
They have the power and the have their own jail. Have the Sgt at Arms detain him until he produces the documents they want.
After that exchange, the entire committee should have turned on that ba$tard and rode him like a rented mule. Sorry sack of $hit.
Why should it matter to Rep. Golmert what AG Holder thinks? Contempt of Congress, Contempt for Congress, whatever.
Why is Holder so defensive? I thought he was resigning.
Once upon a time, this sort of exchange would have resulted in a duel.
Well that crap head can not go any higher on my list! He is number 1!
The Chicago Outfit flexing its muscle? Perish the thought!
Gohmert didn't flinch, and I would have loved it if he had flipped Holder off.
Anon @ April 8, 2014 at 3:41 PM
Concur.
@Robert Fowler, I read a couple years ago, that Congress did away with the jail. They turned it into office space or the like. When I read the article, I saw it as a giant white flag.
Post a Comment