"You don't give up your rights of any kind," Yukhtman said. "The ATF do not make social calls. The only time the ATF will come to you is if you've done something wrong."
Tell that to David Olofson. Heck, tell that to the Davidians, if you can find any left alive.
13 comments:
You honestly just can't help yourself, can you? You appear to be so "obsessed" with S Kerodin, that you just have to include a disproportionate of your posts.
Care to comment on the court records posted Sunday, Bill? Or are you still drinking that Jonestown KoolAid?
I have an acquaintance who collects Makarov pistols, certainly not class 11. He once purchased three pistols in a day or two, for his collection. The ATF did not pay him a social call, but instead sent two 'gofers' from the Pennsylvania State Police to check him out. They insisted he show them his collection and accompanied him right to his gun room. When he told me about it, I asked him why he didn't tell them to go bugger each other. He had done nothing illegal, so he should have stood up to these 'gofer' scum. If they, ATF/Gofers, will come for Makarovs, don't be fooled about class 11.
No I still have not done my own checking on what you posted. I drink no ones so called "kool aid", whoever may be offering. However your sycophants and followers seem to have no qualms drinking yours.
True to form, you, yet again, respond with derogatory/personal "attacks".
David Thibodeau is one such survivor of the Waco debacle. His book is well worth the read.
http://www.amazon.com/Place-Called-Waco-Survivors-Story/dp/1891620428
Hilariously, bill gives up his position (announced he is here reading) and does so absent ammunition (words besides Saul tactics). His position exposed and confronted directly, he simply high tales it outta here.
Nice tactical error there, Bill. Exposing your own position, willfully and while unarmed, is pure idiocy. But then, true colors always shine through, eventually. Don't they ?
tAnonymous at November 5, 2013 at 10:54 AM;
You must be rather dense as I have stated in other comments that SSI is and has been a "DAILY READ" for quite some time. I also very publicly stated the respect I have Mike on his site.
I gave no tactical position away and why would you believe I need to be "armed"?
You give nothing more than another example of "attacks" but nothing more. Figures.
tHey anonymous, if you truly and honestly believe in your black hart and hopeless Soul that I am in the "literal" sense "unarmed", would you a shot at testing the theory?
To paint with such a broad brush does you a rather severe dis-service. You should paint with a small brush so you do not falsely cover the entire wall you may be painting.
Just a little suggestion/advice. Take it fro what it is worth.
I guess according to the "rules " of Sipsey/MVB as the enemy.
Oh how far we have fallen and drifted from the Republic our Founding left us for our posterity and fro all time.
Still waiting for you,bill, to offer up the ammo you claim to have. You were asked directly to discuss something in particular. Instead, you shoot blanks attempting to pick a target, freeze it and then mock it - all in attempt to divert attention away from the fact you cannot bring to bear debate if substance regarding your original complaint.
So what's it gonna be, Bill? Three more posts of misdirection or will you respond to the question put to you by the author of this blog?
It's funny you think you do not make tactical mistakes - for you just made another - for all to see. You took a shit at Mike, he responded with an offer of debate ( asking you a direct question, and you instead decide to point your posts at another you don't even know.
This time, your error is that even though you make a direct personal attack on Mike, calling him the enemy, you take your attention off him and focus on me instead. I had wondered if you would make just such another tactical mistake - and you did so in spades.
Bill, I'm interested in reading what you have to say in response to what Mike asked you. Do you have a response ( ammo)? Right now, I'm betting any powder you thought and claim you have is ALL WET. But hey, provide me wrong. Let's see ya School MV! Let's see ya bring all that ammo to bear and show us all why mike is "wrong" about the K-man.
Or keep looking for other ways to avoid responding to his inquiry (that YOU initiated).
Time to choose, lightweight. What's it gonna be?
Anonymous,
Point one; please kindly direct me to where I "offered up ammo" or "claimed" to have ammo in this thread? Also point me in the direction pertaining to any "inquiry I initiated" that has a damn thing to do with court records? Good luck.
Point two; As to my so called "original complaint" as you call it, it had NOTHING to do with any "court records". It was directed at the disproportionate amount of posts (recently) directed at S. Keridin, versus all the other posts/items Mr Vanderbeogh places here. It both detracts from the useful knowledge and is distracting. I never stated in my comment anything such as " Let's see ya School MV!"
If you re-read the comment, you should be able to discern this statement, as opposed to making the rather wild and laughingly false assertions towards me you proceeded to aim in my direction.
Assertions/assumptions such as; "It's funny you think you do not make tactical mistakes", stating I made claims of having "ammo". Stating that whatever "thought and claim" I have is "all wet".
Oh and lest it is forgotten, based on internet BS you make a blatant assumption that I am,(in your eyes and 'mind') a "lightweight" and appear to believe you have some kind of authority over me to make a determination of "
Time to choose, lightweight. What's it gonna be?".
Using you very own words you direct these words/statements "at another you don't even know".
Would you also like to play (pretend) authoritarian/dictator as to the time I am "allowed" to go over all the court records and pertaining material? Those records which MVB posted on another day which you claim I "initiated".
I will take all the time I DEEM necessary to look at all records, not just court records, to form MY opinion on the matter. I very clearly stated that "I HAD NOT DONE MY OWN CHECKING ON WHAT WAS POSTED". Evidently it was not clear enough for those choosing to hide behind "anonymity" while clamoring away on their keyboard. (clue,it does not exist in the real world)
Mr. Ford,
It is my professional opinion that you have enlisted in a bad cause and have been drinking too much KoolAid. Seriously, what is your reaction to the court documents and the questions they raise? You have by now certainly had enough time. How do YOU explain them?
Mr Vanderboegh,
Your "professional" opinion would be incorrect. I enlisted in nothing and I despise KoolAid, no matter who dispenses it and no matter the flavor.
As to the court docs.,in my not in any way, "professional" opinion, from what I have read, it actually isn't over with yet. Essentially all; the legalize BS boils down to this; clean up your claim, refile the claim and we (court)will go from there. Kind of like, "wipe the dog-shit from your shoes before I allow you into my home."
As to any attempt from me "explaining" anything coming from a "court" (.gov); being as how I am not an egotistical,narcissistic psychopath as all those working in/for.gov I have no clue as to what "reasoning or logic" they use to come up with their so called "explanations".
You may wish to ask Mr Anonymous to explain them. He/she appears to be like them; no rationality, reason/logic, civility/politeness is his/her "thought processes", none at all.
Post a Comment