Sunday, November 3, 2013

Hearst "Yellow Journalist" Dan Freedman once again shaking his tin cup for more ATF power and money but in the process makes an interesting revelation about the NRA.

I have previously excoriated Dan Freedman as "The Cowardly Liar," and "ATF's favorite press flack." Now comes Freedman shaking the tin cup for more ATF power and money: "ATF poorly armed with funding as duties grow."
It has the usual tripe about Fast and Furious, including this gem:
The misguided Operation Fast and Furious, in which agents in Phoenix were told to stand by while Mexican drug cartel intermediaries bought weapons in local gun stores and smuggled them across the border, largely resulted from management errors within the bureau and the local U.S. attorney's office.
Ah, yes, the "botched operation." You know, the one that Freedman at first studiously ignored and then, when it became embarrassing, minimized. But there is also this interesting factoid:
There are many forces behind the agency's second-class status. One is federal law enforcement competition, where the agency has long struggled with the FBI, Drug Enforcement Administration and others for dollars.
But a major factor is the political animosity generated by enforcing gun laws. The NRA stands out as the single organization in or out of government most intimately involved in shaping the bureau's mission.
Jim Pasco, an ATF lobbyist on Capitol Hill in the 1980s and '90s, recalls negotiating the agency's budget with his NRA counterpart, Jim Baker.
"I'd say, 'I need 200 more agents, 100 more inspectors,' " said Pasco, who added that he promised the new hires would stick to chasing criminals with guns, not the gun owners and collectors who are the bulwark of the NRA.
After that, he said, Baker "would sign off."
Baker, now the gun group's senior lobbyist, insists that the NRA never had veto power over agency's budgets. "The contention that somehow the NRA is responsible for the amount of money appropriated or not appropriated for ATF is erroneous," he said.
Which is no denial of Pasco's contention. "Give us more power and money and we promise we won't target law-abiding firearm owners." Yeah, that's worked out real well over the past couple of decades.
I read this promise that "the new hires would stick to chasing criminals with guns" and immediately had this image form in my head: "Little Jimmy" Vann and the anti-firearm zealots in the Chief Counsel's Office are sitting in a meeting being briefed on next year's budget by Pasco and laughing uproariously. "Little Jimmy" is saying incredulously, "And he BOUGHT that?!? What an idiot!"
More evidence of symbiosis, if any were needed, between the gun cops and the Lairds of Fairfax.
LATER: Freedman also filed this subtle rewriting of history: "How the NRA became ATF's biggest enemy."
There is mention of the anger at the early ATF outrages, but no mention of the "go along get along" NRA leadership that gave the ATF a pass until the movement led by Neal Knox swept them away. No mention of the revanchist coup of the old guard that toppled Knox and led to the regime of Wayne LaPierre and the Lairds of Fairfax. (See The Gun Rights War.) No mention that the struggle for the soul of the NRA continues to this day with a board badly split between principle and appeasement. But then that wouldn't fit Freedman's meme.

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

You forgot to propound the most important evidence in that Mike....

"Jim Pasco AN ATF LOBBYIST"

ATF is admitting to hiring a lobbyist?

Oregon Hobo said...

Mike, I share your frustration with and suspicion of the NRA, but finally capitulated and signed up for a membership during the post-Newtown feeding frenzy.

I have high regard for your insights and would be grateful for any thoughts on the directorship vote at their next annual meeting. Are you aware of any candidates whom you believe to be genuine?

I propose that the 1 million additional members the NRA is reported to have picked up in early 2013 are unlikely to be politically timid, considering the circumstances under which they joined. What better time could there be for us to regain control of the NRA?

I've seen more than one election (not for NRA directors) where the vote was split among multiple pro-gun candidates and one anti-gun turd. Guess who won?

A little bit of unifying guidance in this matter could surely go a long way. Were we to effect such a coup, the resultant wailing and gnashing of teeth alone would be worth the effort.

#Hobo#

Ed said...

Going after gun owning citizens offers less risk and is much easier for those who are just biding time until retirement.

Criminals are so much more difficult to deal with, may shoot at you to avoid arrest, and are not known to compliantly fill out BATFE Form 4473 when they acquire firearms (they are not required to do so as it would violate their 5th Amendment rights). That endangers your chance of reaching retirement intact.

Besides, if there was a group of Federal officers dedicated as much to abrogating First Amendment rights as the BATFE is to denying Second Amendment rights, how popular would they be?

http://www.atf.gov/files/forms/download/atf-f-4473-1.pdf