Tuesday, July 9, 2013

Three from David Codrea.

'Assaulted: Civil Rights Under Fire' a powerful way to share gun truths
One choice I think was inspired was the selection of rapper and actor Ice T to narrate the documentary. I thought the guy not only did a great job, providing an especially credible and sincere presence, but it’s inarguable that he broadens the film’s appeal and totally nullifies the stereotyping that opponents of the right to keep and bear arms routinely use to dismiss and disparage “average” gun owners.
I think “Assaulted: Civil Rights Under Fire” is powerful. I think it’s enlightening. I think it’s persuasive. I think everyone, not just gun owners, should see it, and I think it’s up to us to help make that happen.
EEOC's claim that background checks are racist must also apply to guns
If criminal background checks and requiring photo IDs really do produce unlawfully discriminatory rights-denying results, the inescapable conclusion is agents of the government are willfully, with premeditation, engaged in a criminal conspiracy to disenfranchise minorities from their right to keep and bear arms.
FISA head judge doesn’t understand gun rights, either
“In his opinion, Judge Walton … wrote: ‘[T]he Court must conclude that the Second Amendment does not confer an individual right to possess firearms. Rather, the Amendment's objective is to ensure the vitality of state militias,’" the VPC release continued.
That such a man is wielding such power, heading a secret court, invoking secret “laws” and issuing secret rulings ought to scare more than just gun owners, and perhaps may even persuade some fence-sitters that the Founders may have just been on to something when they made sure an ultimate last resort freedom fail-safe would exist, just in case the need for one ever does happen here.

3 comments:

disgusted said...

This should be required reading for everyone.
Just another example of the sorry state of affairs in this country.

Anonymous said...

The militias vitality is ensured by the inalienable, individual, enumerated, natural, civil, fundamental, imcorporatef right to keep and bear arms.

It is not a right to serve in the militia whence a state calls it forth. It is a right to exercise so proficiency exists when it is called. Heller was crystal clear about that point.

How many more ways does it have to be stated?

Anonymous said...

Hey Judge,
Amendment II doesn't convey a right, it protects the right to keep and bear (possess and carry) firearms. All amendments in the Bill of Rights don't convey rights. They all require government to protect rights that we as human beings already have. The ninth and tenth amendments also help broadly limit the power of the Federal Government.

Who appointed that dumbass judge to the bench?

- Old Greybeard