Now you know that we are getting close to Holder when the NYT tries to denigrate the guy holding the torch to the fire. Two more hearings - hope their questions tie the knot.
It's been awhile since I congratulated you for kicking Holder in the balls. Just cause we don't see him holding onto his crotch doesn't mean his nuts aren't on fire.
4 comments:
Now you know that we are getting close to Holder when the NYT tries to denigrate the guy holding the torch to the fire. Two more hearings - hope their questions tie the knot.
I hear Clinton's rules of engagement calling.
The lying sacks of shit in the lame stream media are begging for attention.
Factual errors? In the New York Times? I'm shocked! Shocked I tell you! Shocked!
It's been awhile since I congratulated you for kicking Holder in the balls. Just cause we don't see him holding onto his crotch doesn't mean his nuts aren't on fire.
Post a Comment