Thursday, May 28, 2009

Machine guns in Alabama creeks, barreled AR15 uppers and ammo in Texas dumpsters & one EXPENSIVE case of pulchritude.



Howard Nemerov reports here that eight barreled AR15 receivers, 1600 rounds of 5.56 and about 1000 rounds of miscellaneous pistol ammunition were found in an Austin dumpster AND SOMEBODY CALLED THE COPS!!!!!

Remember the Jap machineguns in a Bibb County, Alabama creek? Why can't this ever happen to ME????

But I can make an educated guess about how those barreled receivers and ammo got into that dumpster.

Let us join Mr. Peabody and Sherman in the Wayback Machine and journey back to the year 1971. The place is Marion, Ohio. I get a call from a high school buddy who is now a municipal garbageman:

"Hey, Mike, you gotta see something."

"What?"

"No, I can't tell you, you just gotta SEE it."

"OK, where is IT?"

"Meet me at the Frisch's."

Meaning the Frisch's Big Boy drive in, where we burned many a gallon of gas trying to attract (largely unsuccessfully) the attention of what passed for young Buckeye pulchritude a mere two years earlier.

Fifteen minutes later, I am there. He is parked all the way over on the far side of the lot in the middle of the day. No one is around.

Wordlessly, he opens his trunk lid.

It is packed with firearms. Pistols (I remember a mint WWI M1911 that Alvin York could have carried), scoped deer rifles, shotguns, an M1 Garand, a couple of carbines, more than thirty weapons all told.

"What the hell . . .?"

"We picked them up over on Harding Memorial Parkway," (where all the ritzy homes in Marion were in those days) he explained. "There were four garbage cans packed with guns and we split 'em up between the three of us."

"They threw them away?!?!?"

"Yeah, we went up to the door to tell 'em that they couldn't throwaway guns in the trash and this lady says, 'OK, fine, I'll give 'em to you if you want 'em.' So we took 'em. We split 'em up and took 'em. There was about a hundred of 'em. She told us they were her husband's and he just ran off with another woman. Said she guessed if he left her, he must of left his guns too."

"Can I have one?" I ventured to ask.

"Got any money?"

"No," I said disconsolately.

"Sorry, man, go find your own."

True story.

That is when I first learned the truth of the statement, "Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned." I don't know what motivated that guy to run off with another woman, but that was one expensive case of pulchritude.

A Warning to Young Men on Thinking With the Wrong Head: The Dangers of Pulchritude.

Wednesday, May 27, 2009

Training Opportunity: Blairsville GA, Warrior Skills Camp.

Grenadier1 sends me this email:


Mike,

Thought I would reach out to you to see if we can get some information up in front of your network or readers. July the Fourth weekend there will be a series of training classes in Blairsville GA.

This is being put on by Gabe Suarez’s organization and is being billed as the Warrior Skills Camp. Its three two day sessions starting on the Thursday and ending the following Tuesday.


apparently there are still slots open for this camp. The cost is $450.00 per session this includes lodging and meals. Says Grenadier1:

This is too fine an opportunity to waste. The link for sign up is here.

This is one of Gabe’s affiliated instructors and his local site so registration is via his outlet. However the thread discussing the event is here.


From Rick Klopp at that link:

I realize that there has been a tremendous amount of interest in the Warrior Skills Camp although some of the details are still being worked on. Here's what I know so far:

The dates will be from July 2 (Thurs) through July 7 (Tues). We will be offering classes from various instructors that range from 1/2 to 2 days. A local Christian camp will be the host and are providing both accommodations (bunk style - guys and girls cabins) and meals. Participants also will have the choice to stay at local hotels, camp and RV sites, bed and breakfasts, etc. The program is being presented as a family event and as such will have both training venues and other activities for spouses and children.

You will have the option to sign up for a 2-day, 4-day, or 6-day block of time and attend whichever classes are being offered during that time. A detailed schedule is currently being prepared and a PDF registration form is underway.

So far, the instructors who have expressed an interest are:

Gabe Suarez - class TBD
Rick Klopp - DPS Basics
Dan Agakian - Kalashnikov Rifle Gunfighting
Dan Agakian - High Risk Operator - Team Tactics
Randy Harris - Force on Force Gunfighting
Ian McDevitt - Trauma Care (both adult & youth classes)
Tom Sotis - Knife Defense (both adult & youth classes)
Corinna Copeland - Woman's Only Firearms Class
Chris Hoshiyama (SHIHAN on WT) - Awareness and basic self defense (both adult & youth classes)

Additional activities that are being planned include:

Paintball
Challenge Course
Basic Marksmanship Skills (air pistol/rifle)
Rock Climbing
Canoe & Kayak Training and River Trip
Wilderness Survival Skills
Horseback Riding
Additional activities for spouses and children

Transportation from/to the Atlanta airport and all activities can be provided by the camp with advance notice.

OK - that's a great lineup of training without having to travel around - now what about the cost? Don't hold me to it although at this time we are looking at a flat rate of about $500 per person for each two day block of time. This would include all training, meals, lodging, and other special events. The rate for each additional family member would be $100 for each 2 day block of time plus the cost of each activity (actual training or other activity). If you choose alternate accomodations, the cost would be less although you're not going to find it less expensive and you would miss out on the fun and fellowship. Remember, however, that these are rustic bunk-style cabins.

That's it for now - I will post additional details later this week. Please remember that the above rates are somewhat tentative and are based on a good response by you guys.

This would be a prime opportunity to receive some excellent SI training for both youself individually as well as for the family. PM me or e-mail me at northstartactical@hotmail.com if you have any specific questions.

Rick


Suarez training has been very highly recommended to me, although $450.00 sure seems like a lot, folks tell me it's worth it.

"The End of Capitalism as We Know It" -- Another example of "Welcome to the party, pal!"

Gun owners to Business: "Welcome to the party, pal!"

From Pete's Western Rifle Shooters Association blog today comes some great links including We Don't Need No Steenkin' Rule of Law here and What's That Burning Smell? here.

Pete's comment on We Don't Need No Steenkin' Rule of Law:

Courtesy of Balko's The Agitator comes this piece explaining why the consequences of Obama's cramdown of Chrysler's secured creditors go far beyond the auto industry.

Read it all and then pass it on, please.

Only a fool would think that Chrysler's creditors will be the last to be looted.

I will have one short comment at the end.

Mike
III

The End of Capitalism as We Know It

Posted by Joshua Claybourn on 21 May 2009

Arguably the most fundamental, crucial element to a civil society is the rule of law. A corollary to this notion is that of contract rights - when two or more people enter into a valid agreement that they intend to be honored, the agreement should indeed be honored. In the U.S., contract law is sacrosanct and it would not be facetious to say that the entire world’s economy depends on America’s respect for its laws and contracts.

All contracts are important in some way, but credit contracts are particularly important to a functioning capitalist system. That’s why Article V of the U.S. Constitution prohibits states from interfering with the obligation to pay debts. And Article 1, Section 8 reinforces this point by delegating to the federal government the sole authority to enact “uniform laws on the subject of bankruptcies.”

Under these long standing bankruptcy laws - enacted and enforced by the federal government under the Constitution - a secured creditor is entitled to first priority under the “absolute priority rule.” Other nonsecured creditors have “junior” priority. The purpose of this rule should seem clear. When you offer credit to some one or some thing, and do so on the condition that it is secured by an asset, you should be first in line to collect before those providing credit without such security. Unfortunately President Obama’s actions throughout the Chrysler bankruptcy have trampled over these well worn bankruptcy laws, contract rights, and even the rule of law.

One of Chrysler’s secured creditors was the State of Indiana, or more particularly, pension funds administered by the state. But now that Chrysler has filed for bankruptcy, Indiana and other secured creditors are being forced to the back of the line so that unions can proceed to the front. For every dollar of secured creditors’ claims, they’re receiving only 30 cents. Compare that the the United Auto Workers union, an unsecured junior creditor, who will get 50 cents on the dollar.

Why? It’s not because any contract, agreement or bankruptcy law calls for it, but because the federal government decided it was politically convenient. Of course, we’ve become far too familiar with the government robbing Peter to pay Paul, but in this instance the government is violating the rule of law to do it. The arbitrary whims of Obama’s administration threaten the very foundation of capitalism.

Henceforth lenders will hesitate to provide credit, and eager entrepreneurs and businessmen will struggle to find it, because any credit can now apparently be confiscated by government greed regardless of the law or the existence of a binding contract. Simply put, the price of borrowing will now go up because lenders must account for a new risk - government intervention.

Obama has assisted the UAW in this instance, an entity which just so happened to be crucial to his election. But how many union workers in the future will be laid off - or never hired in the first place - because their employer couldn’t find credit or loans for expansion?

Thousands upon thousands of people are getting steamrolled by this outrageous affront to the credit system, but only Indiana has objected, and its efforts appear to be fruitless thus far. I fear that President Obama’s actions in the Chrysler bankruptcy signal the dawn of a new era in which powerful political interests trump capitalism and the sanctity of contracts. May God have mercy on us all.


MBV: NO! May God have mercy on THEM. When the American people finally wake up to this courtesy of the economic and societal collapse that it will engender there will be NO place these law breakers can hide that is far away enough or in as deep a hole enough that they will be safe from from the consequences of their actions.

"This is how the BATFE keeps us safe."


Go here and read Kurt Hoffman's latest Gun Examiner column. You should bookmark both his and David Codrea's Examiner columns. Heck, almost ALL the Gun Examiners are doing a great job informing us. So go and read: "This is how the BATFE keeps us safe."

Tuesday, May 26, 2009

Obama’s Transportation Secretary Says He Wants to ‘Coerce People Out of Their Cars’ -- Is Turnabout Fair Play?

Ray LaHood and Barry the Blade, two prominent members of the Gangster Government who wish to coerce you out of your car.

My thanks to typeay, who forwarded me this story about the appropriately named Ray La Hood of Barry the Blade's Gangster Government, who is quoted by CNS News here that he wishes to coerce us out of our cars. I have a question about this policy on the other side.

Mike
III

Obama’s Transportation Secretary Says He Wants to ‘Coerce People Out of Their Cars’

Tuesday, May 26, 2009

By Terence P. Jeffrey, Editor-in-Chief


(CNSNews.com) - Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood told a group of reporters at the National Press Club on Thursday that he wants to “coerce people out of their cars.”

In Newsweek magazine last week, nationally syndicated columnist George Will published a piece critical of Lahood, entitled, “Ray LaHood, Transformed--Secretary of Behavior Modification.”

“He says he has joined a ‘transformational’ administration: ‘I think we can change people's behavior,’” Will reports that LaHood said over lunch.

LaHood, a former Republican congressman from Peoria, Ill., has become a champion of using the Department of Transportation and federal transportation spending to get people to take trains, busses, and ride bikes instead of driving cars.

At the National Press Club on Thursday he attempted to respond to George Will’s column and to explain his vision for using the power of government to change people’s transportation behavior and to change the nature of American residential communities.

“We want to really--and notwithstanding the fact that George Will doesn't like this idea--the idea of creating opportunities for people to get out of their cars--and we're working with the secretary of HUD, Shaun Donovan, on opportunities for housing, walking paths, biking paths,” said LaHood. “If somebody wants to ride their bike, if--to work or to the place of employment or to other places--mass transit, light rail--creating opportunities for what we call livable communities.”

The moderator of the press club event asked LaHood: “Some in the highway-supporters motorist groups have been concerned by your livability initiative. Is this an effort to make driving more torturous and to coerce people out of their cars?”

LaHood answered: “It is a way to coerce people out of their cars.

“Yeah,” he continued, “I mean, look, people don't like spending an hour and a half getting to work. And people don't like spending an hour going to the grocery store. And all of you who live around here know exactly what I'm talking about. You know, the dreaded thing is to have to run an errand on a weekend around here or to try and get home at 3:00 in the afternoon or even 5:00 in the afternoon.

“Now, look, every community is not going to be a livable community. But we have to create opportunities for people that do want to use a bicycle or want to walk or want to get on a streetcar or want to ride a light rail,” said LaHood.

Lahood suggested to the reporters that George Will is the only person opposed to using the government to promote mass transit and bicycling over driving a car.

“And the only person that I've heard of that objects to this is George Will. Check out Newsweek magazine,” said LaHood.

Lahood then made a joke about the fact that some conservatives believe that the way he wants to use the Department of Transportation represents an increased government intrusion in people’s lives.

“Some conservative groups are wary of the livable communities program, saying it's an example of government intrusion into people's lives,” said the moderator. “How do you respond?”

“About everything we do around here is government intrusion in people's lives,” said LaHood. “So have at it.”


Hmmm. So, is turnabout fair play? Here's how somebody in Pakistan tried to coerce the new President of the country out of HIS car back in September of last year:

"In this picture released by the Press Information Department, bullet marks are seen in a window of the car of Pakistan Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani which was attacked in Islamabad, Pakistan, Wednesday, Sept 3, 2008. Pakistan's prime minister survived an apparent assassination attempt Wednesday when at least two shots hit his limousine as he drove toward the capital."

Here's another view.

And another.

So that's how the "coerce politicians out of their cars game" is played in Pakistan. Obviously they didn't use one of these:

Barrett M82

This is how they coerced Iraqi politicians out of their cars back in 2006. Is this what LaHood has in mind?

Just wondering.

Crisis spurs spike in 'suburban survivalists' -- What? We can't blame the NRA and paranoid gun nuts?


Go here and read liberal heresy. Note two things. First, that these are not your "traditional bitter clingers," hence whatever is panicking them is NOT the NRA. Second, they don't even mention firearms, but you can bet Great Aunt Tizzie's voluminous bra that folks who are buying supplies are, at least some of them, buying firearms too.

In my neck of the woods, these are what we call "newbies."

Mike
III


Crisis spurs spike in 'suburban survivalists'

May 25 12:37 PM US/Eastern

By GILLIAN FLACCUS

Associated Press Writer

SAN DIEGO (AP) - Six months ago, Jim Wiseman didn't even have a spare nutrition bar in his kitchen cabinet.

Now, the 54-year-old businessman and father of five has a backup generator, a water filter, a grain mill and a 4-foot-tall pile of emergency food tucked in his home in the expensive San Diego suburb of La Jolla.

Wiseman isn't alone. Emergency supply retailers and military surplus stores nationwide have seen business boom in the past few months as an increasing number of Americans spooked by the economy rush to stock up on gear that was once the domain of hardcore survivalists.

These people snapping up everything from water purification tablets to thermal blankets shatter the survivalist stereotype: they are mostly urban professionals with mortgages, SUVs, solid jobs and a twinge of embarrassment about their newfound hobby.

From teachers to real estate agents, these budding emergency gurus say the dismal economy has made them prepare for financial collapse as if it were an oncoming Category 5 hurricane. They worry about rampant inflation, runs on banks, bare grocery shelves and widespread power failures that could make taps run dry.

For Wiseman, a fire protection contractor, that's meant spending roughly $20,000 since September on survival gear—and trying to persuade others to do the same.

"The UPS guy drops things off and he sees my 4-by-8-by-6-foot pile of food and I say 'What are you doing to prepare, buddy?'" he said. "Because there won't be a thing left on any shelf of any supermarket in the country if people's confidence wavers."

The surge in interest in emergency stockpiling has been a bonanza for camping supply companies and military surplus vendors, some of whom report sales spikes of up to 50 percent. These companies usually cater to people preparing for earthquakes or hurricanes, but informal customer surveys now indicate the bump is from first-time shoppers who cite financial, not natural, disaster as their primary concern, they say.

Top sellers include 55-gallon water jugs, waterproof containers, freeze-dried foods, water filters, water purification tablets, glow sticks, lamp oil, thermal blankets, dust masks, first-aid kits and inexpensive tents.

Joe Branin, owner of the online emergency supply store Living Fresh, said he's seen a 700 percent increase in orders for water purification tablets in the past month and a similar increase in orders for sterile water pouches.

He is shipping meals ready to eat and food bars by the case to residential addresses nationwide.

"You're hearing from the people you will always hear from, who will build their own bunkers and stuff," he said. "But then you're hearing from people who usually wouldn't think about this, but now it's in their heads: 'What if something comes to the worst?'"

Online interest in survivalism has increased too. The niche Web site SurvivalBlog.com has seen its page views triple in the past 14 months to nearly 137,000 unique visitors a week. Jim Rawles, a self-described survivalist who runs the site, calls the newcomers "11th hour believers." He charges $100 an hour for phone consulting on emergency preparedness and says that business also has tripled.

"There's so many people who are concerned about the economy that there's a huge interest in preparedness, and it pretty much crosses all lines, social, economic, political and religious," he said. "There's a steep learning curve going on right now."

Art Markman, a cognitive psychologist, said he's not surprised by the reaction to the nation's financial woes—even though it may seem irrational. In an increasingly global and automated society, most people are dependent on strangers and systems they don't understand—and the human brain isn't programmed to work that way.

"We have no real causal understanding of the way our world works at all," said Markman, a professor at the University of Texas, Austin. "When times are good, you trust that things are working, but when times are bad you realize you don't have a clue what you would do if the supermarket didn't have goods on the shelves and that if the banks disappear, you have no idea where your money is."

Those preparing for the worst echo those thoughts and say learning to be self sufficient makes them feel more in control amid mounting uncertainty—even if it seems crazy to their friends and families.

Chris Macera, a 29-year-old IT systems administrator, said he started buying extra food to take advantage of sales after he lost his job and he was rehired elsewhere for $30,000 less.

But Macera, who works in suburban Orange County, said that over several months his mentality began to shift from saving money to preparing for possible financial mayhem. He is motivated, too, by memories of the government paralysis that followed Hurricane Katrina.

He now buys 15 pounds of meat at a time and freezes it, and buys wheat in 50-pound bags, mills it into flour and uses it to bake bread. He checks survivalist Web sites for advice at least once a day and listens to survival podcasts.

"You kind of have to sift through the people with their hats on a little bit too tight," said Macera, who said his colleagues tease him about the grain mill. "But I see a lot of things (on the Web) and they're real common sense-type things."

"I don't want to be a slave to anybody," he said. "The more systems you're dependent on, the more likely things are going to go bad for you."

That's a philosophy shared by Vincent Springer, a newcomer to emergency preparedness from the Chicago area.

Springer, a high school social studies teacher, says he's most worried about energy shortages and an economic breakdown that could paralyze the just-in-time supply chain that grocery stores rely on.

In the past few months, Springer has stockpiled enough freeze-dried food for three months and bought 72-hour emergency supply kits for himself, his wife and two young children. The 39-year-old is also teaching himself to can food.

"I'm not looking for a retreat in northern Idaho or any of that stuff, but I think there's more people like me out there and I think those numbers are growing," he said.

Regulation war: business in crosshairs

Gun owners to Business: "Welcome to the party, pal!"

So, now Mr. Businessman, you are discovering Chucky Schumer and the Creature from Jekyll Island are enemies of your liberty, too. Haven't been paying attention have you?

Two remarkable things about this article.

First, the author quotes Thomas Jefferson on the dangers of national banks to liberty.

Second, it contains a hilariously funny dig at Congress:

"It would seem that such heady discussions would surely exhaust most of the intellectual capacity in Congress in short order."

I almost spit my iced tea all over the keyboard with that one.

Here's the link at Politico.com.

Here's the story.

Mike
III

Regulation war: business in crosshairs

By Jeanne Cummings

26 May 2009

A battle royal is brewing on Capitol Hill for an already bruised business community.

The Treasury Department this week is expected to unveil its plan for revamping the patchwork of agencies that oversee the financial industry.

Judging from the talk of add-ons from Congress and even the White House, some business lobbyists figure the package might as well come with Santa wrapping, tinsel and lights.

Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) has announced that he wants to attach a “shareholder bill of rights” to the package. And the White House is talking about adding a consumer board to the regulatory mix.

Both ends of Pennsylvania Avenue are kicking around ideas about outlawing some corporate executive pay practices — and applying the ban well beyond the financial sector.

The upshot is a classic legislative Christmas tree laden with proposed regulations that carry profound consequences for corporate America and the post-recession economy.

“It’s pretty clear that this is not about regulatory reform, though that cloak might be used for some of it. This is about an activist agenda,” said Tom Quaadman, executive director of the U.S. Chamber Center for Capital Markets Competitiveness.

The showdown comes after a string of legislative defeats for the corporate community, from clawed-back bonuses in the financial houses to bankruptcies in the auto sector to passage of the first-ever credit card reform law.

In those cases, isolated industries fought hard against the changes, to no avail. The financial community seems to be headed for the same fate on regulatory reform.

The economic implosion last summer exposed a host of weaknesses — including gaps in oversight, or lax application of it — that prevented early detection of the financial threats, a full understanding of the scale of the problems and an inadequacy of tools to respond to them.

Confronted with those facts, even financial industry officials concede that new regulations are in order. Their worry is overreach — that Congress will impose a draconian system that stifles innovation and handicaps U.S. markets globally.

Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner has been meeting with industry experts in recent weeks to hash out ideas for a package of reforms.

Now, he’s expected to propose legislation giving the government broader authority to seize failing financial conglomerates such as insurance giant American International Group and oversee their dismantling.

The government can already do that with banks through the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., but the current crisis has demonstrated that other large institutions can also pose great risks to the system when they default.

Another expected reform would give the Federal Reserve the power to monitor the economy for any systemic threats such as the explosion of subprime loans that set off the economic slide last summer.

The Fed also would be charged with coordinating the work of the various other regulators.

Expansion of the Fed’s power is already stirring controversy, as it has since the nation’s founding.

Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton fought vigorously over creation of a central bank. President George Washington sided with Hamilton and created the first Bank of the United States.

Even so, Jefferson maintained it was unconstitutional and that service on it was treasonous. “I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies,” he wrote in a letter to James Monroe.

When Jefferson became president, he abolished it.

Over the ensuing decades, a central bank was re-established and abolished and re-established again in 1913 after the 1907 panic.

Today, similar arguments about the Fed’s role are popping up in blogs and in Capitol Hill discussions.

Geithner appears adamant that the Fed should take the role of “systemic supervisor.” And in order to get its way, the White House is “prepared to break China,” he recently warned industry representatives.

But the treasury secretary does seem open to the idea of creating a council representing the existing regulators to advise the Fed, although it’s unknown if he will ultimately propose it.

It would seem that such heady discussions would surely exhaust most of the intellectual capacity in Congress in short order.

But the reform add-ons are likely to spark even more intense debate, and the financial industry is already mobilizing a cavalry of lobbyists to assist — if not rescue — it from congressional overreach.

The Business Roundtable, an organization of major CEOs, unsuccessfully tried to quash Schumer’s shareholder legislation before it was introduced, and, last week, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce put a target on it.

The legislation would dictate changes in the way corporate boards are composed, ban board chairmen from also serving as chief executive officers and give shareholders some say in executive pay packages.

“There are over 15,000 public companies in the U.S., and the vast majority had nothing to do with the financial crisis. They are trying to create a one-size-fits-all,” said Quaadman, noting that Bill Gates served as chairman and CEO of Microsoft for years.

Meanwhile, a flotilla of corporate advocates will join the Business Roundtable and the Chamber to push back against government dictates about private pay packages.

“Not only is the financial industry terrified,” said one lobbyist. “The nonfinancial industries are, too.”

Monday, May 25, 2009

"Only those who are willing to die are fit to live." -- Remembering Captain Joe Barker on Memorial Day.



"Only those who are willing to die are fit to live." -- Captain Joseph Rhett Barker II, Bilibid Prison, Manila, Philippines, a few days before his execution by the Japanese, 8 October 1943.

The quote above is sometimes attributed to General Douglas MacArthur. He said it, no doubt. You can find several times that he said it, after the war. But he stole it from Joe Barker, a young officer who was stuck with the consequences of Macarthur's poor generalship of the Philippine campaign and, though he paid for it with his life, wrote as bright a chapter in American heroism as anyone ever has or ever could.

"The President of the United States takes pride in presenting the Distinguished Service Cross (Posthumously) to Joseph R. Barker, II (0-021155), Captain (Cavalry), U.S. Army, for extraordinary heroism in connection with military operations against an armed enemy (assigned to the 26th Cavalry Regiment, Philippine Scouts), while serving with the Philippine Guerilla Forces, East Central Luzon Guerrilla Area, in action against enemy forces from May 1942 to November 1943, in the Philippine Islands. Captain Barker's intrepid actions, personal bravery and zealous devotion to duty at the cost of his life, exemplify the highest traditions of the military forces of the United States and reflect great credit upon himself, his unit, and the United States Army. Headquarters, U.S. Forces-Pacific, General Orders No. 263 (1946). Home Town: Jefferson County, Alabama. Personal Awards: Distinguished Service Cross (WWII), Silver Star (WWII), Legion of Merit, Purple Heart."

So reads the synopsis of Joe Barker's Distinguished Service Cross citation. It doesn't begin to cover the truth of the sacrifice and fidelity to duty exhibited by the story of this boy from Birmingham, Alabama, who is almost entirely forgotten by fickle history. It is fitting on this Memorial Day, more than sixty-five years after he was beheaded by the Japanese and dumped in an unmarked grave, that we remember Joe Barker.

Joseph Rhett Barker, II, the second son of Joseph H. and Anna Barker, was born in Birmingham on 27 April 1915. He was christened by Dr. Henry Morris Edmonds of the Independent Presbyterian Church, and became a member of that church at the age of twelve. 1927 was a good year for the Barkers. His father was a mortagage banker in the heyday of Birmingham land speculation in the 1920's and became a millionaire. Joe and his brothers and sisters were raised in luxury on hilltop estate overlooking the city. As a boy, Joe was passionately fond of horses and became an excellent polo player.

With the Crash of 1929, however, the family's wealth disappeared virtually overnight. Forced to sell the estate, Joe's father moved his family to Milner Crescent, a modest home not too far from the church that was the center of family affairs. Reverend Edmonds, a vocal opponent of the Klan and a supporter of racial tolerance in the 1920's, often received death threats and yet the Barkers stood by him, even though it is certain that Joseph H. Barker lost business as a result. This must have had a profound effect on young Joe and I think it paid him dividends later in life when he was assigned to the Philippines.

Joe's love of horses led him to join the Birmingham Sabres, Headquarters Troop, 55th Cavalry Brigade, Alabama National Guard. While in the Guard he served as General Persons' orderly on several tours of strike duty in the Birmingham District. A statewide competitive examination sent him as the representative of the Alabama National Guard to West Point Military Academy, where after a distinguished career which included being named the editor-in-chief of the West Point annual, the Howitzer, he graduated in 1938, commissioned a Second Lieutenant.

Assigned to the 26th Cavalry Regiment, Philippine Scouts, he spent the two and a half years before Pearl Harbor training troops, playing polo, and spending whatever spare time he could learning the history, folkways and languages of the Islands. He quickly fell in love with the Filipino people. By all accounts, he followed the old dictum that if you take care of your troops, they'll take care of you. His Scouts loved him.

Barker also became interested in relics of the Ming Dynasty, when for centuries the Chinese had occupied the Philippines. He accompanied Professor Olav Janse of Harvard University on several archaeological expeditions. Joe by that time spoke five of the native dialects and acted as interpreter.

Then came Pearl Harbor, followed by Macarthur freezing and allowing the Japanese to destroy his air force on the ground followed up with the Japanese amphibious landings. Once again, Dugout Doug dithered. When he finally made up his mind, the 26th Cavalry drew the short straw to try to stop the Japanese who were driving south from the Lingayen Gulf beaches toward Manila. It was vital that the approaches to Bataan be held open long enough for the rest of MacArthur's force to come up from the south.

On Christmas Eve, 1941, at the battle of Binaloan, Joe Barker won the Silver Star for gallantry in action. From the official U.S. Army history of the campaign:

The action of 24 December placed the Japanese in position for the final drive toward the Agno River. At about 0500, with the 4th Tank Regiment in the lead, the Japanese made contact with the 26th Cavalry outposts north and west of Binaloan. Although the Scouts had no antitank guns, they were able to stop the first attack. (MBV: By using Molotov cocktails made of Coca Cola bottles, dropping hand grenades down the hatches and firing .45 pistols in the vision slits.) The tanks then swung west to bypass the American positions, leaving the infantry to continue the fight for Binaloan, By 0700 the 26th Cavalry had blunted the assault and inflicted many casualties on the enemy. Pursuing their advantage, the Scouts counterattacked and the Japanese had to send in more tanks to stop the 26th Cavalry. Even with the aid of tanks, the Japanese made no progress. Sometime during the morning the 2nd Formosa joined the attack, and the cavalrymen found themselves in serious trouble. Too heavily engaged to break off the action and retire, they continued to fight on.

At this juncture, General Wainwright arrived at Binaloan to see Selleck. He found neither General Selleck, who had gone to Wainwright's command post to report, nor any 71st Division troops, but did find the 26th Cavalry, which now numbered no more than 450 men. He ordered Pierce to get his wounded men and supply train out as quickly as possible and to fight a delaying action before withdrawing southeast across the Agno to Tayug. For more than four hours the cavalrymen held their position against overwhelming odds, and at 1530 began to withdraw. By dusk the last elements had reached Tayug and the 2nd Formosa entered Binaloan. "Here," said General Wainwright, himself a cavalryman, "was true cavalry delaying action, fit to make a man's heart sing. Pierce, the day upheld the best traditions of the cavalry service." -- The Fall of the Philippines, Louis Morton, p. 138.


Finally, the last of MacArthur's troops made it into Bataan. Joe fought throughout the battle of Bataan, further earning the Legion of Merit for the handling of his troops in many bitter engagements. Joe, the consummate horseman, along with the rest of the 26th, had to shoot his horse so that the wounded and sick could get some protein.

By the 9 April, 1942, the fight for Bataan was over. Barker and another Lieutenant of the 26th, Edwin Ramsey, were cut off at the end with about 60 men, so they didn't get the order to surrender. But they knew from the silence it was over. From Ramsey's memoir:

"I had never been close to Joseph Rhett Barker II; indeed, I had never particularly cared for his aristocratic Alabama manner and West Point hauteur. But there was little of that left now. Barker too was emaciated; it was a brotherhood we all shared, an inescapable fraternity of malnutrition, exhaustion and doom.

"How do you feel Ed?" he asked me when I reported to him.

"Pretty good, sir."

He gave a disdainful frown at the "sir."

"We're all in it now," he shrugged. He put out his hand and I shook it.

In FOR it now, crossed my mind, but I said nothing. (Lieutenant Ramsey's War, p. 75)


. . .

Joe Barker and I divided up our rations and cooked it among some rocks by the river. For the past few days we had made the march together, falling into step with each other and sharing desultory conversation. All formality had dissolved between us as our condition worsened, and I had come to admire his stoicism and courage.

"No artillery today," he said, pinching some rice and fish between his fingertips and fitting them into his mouth. His face was haggard and hollow, and his beard hung in dirty tangles. His uniform, like mine, was in rags and stained with sweat from the unbroken weeks of marching, fighting, and hiding. As he scrupulously gathered up the buts of food from the bottom of his tin mug, I noticed that his fingers had become so thin that he now wore his big West Point ring on his thumb.

"You thinking it means what I'm thinking?" I asked him.

He shrugged. "I don't see how it could be anything else. We'll find out soon enough."

"What'll you do?"

"Don't suppose I'd last long in a prison camp. How 'bout you?"

"Me neither. I guess I'll take my chances."

Barker nodded. "If it comes to it, I guess I will too. Try for the southern islands, then maybe New Guinea and Australia."

"What do you think are the chances?"

He smiled wanly. "Slim to none. Surrendering doesn't appeal to me, though."

It was a sentiment I appreciated instinctively. "You want to try for it together?" I suggested.

He thought it over a minute and put out his bony hand to me. "You're on," he said. (Ibid, pp. 83-84)


Together, Barker and Ramsey made their way through Japanese held territory, making for the mountains north of Bataan. Along the they picked up a starving, sick Private Gene Strickland of the U.S. 31st Infantry. Though it held them up and almost cost them their lives, they stuck by Strickland and brought him out too.
Eventually, they made their way to Colonel Claude Thorp, who had been sent out of Bataan by MacArthur's orders before the fall to gather arms, form local Philippine Constabulary men into a guerrilla force and disrupt the enemy from behind. Thorp assumed command of all irregular forces on Luzon. Barker and Ramsey joined Thorp and began their career as guerrilla leaders. Ramsey recalls:

A few days after my meeting with Colonel Thorp, Joe Barker returned. We now were commanders of a nascent guerrilla force with responsibility for the vast central plain of Luzon, Bataan and the city of Manila, and we had not the slightest idea how to go about organizing them. We began timidly, making contact with civic leaders in the nearby town of Porac who were known to be loyal and anti-Japanese. Five of these we commissioned as officers in the East Central Luzon Guerrilla Area force and charged them with recruiting local people into cadres. To each cadre we assigned a soldier from our headquarters who was to provide basic military training.

From the first, Barker and I had to improvise tactics. Under Thorp's instructions we followed the structural formulae of the Communist guerrillas who were already operating in Central Luzon. Call the Hukbalahap, or Huks, these guerrillas were the military wing of the Philippine Communist Party, and they had had years of experience in clandestine organizing. By the time Bataan fell, they were already mobilized and moving swiftly from one battlefield to the next, scavenging weapons and supplies.

Their tactics were derived from the writings of Mao Tse-Tung, who at that time was supreme commander of the guerrilla army in China. Through contacts within the Huks, Barker and I managed to obtain a copy of Mao's book on guerrilla warfare, and we passed it back and forth, studying it in our spare time and discussing its lessons over meals and on the march.

The essential principle framed by Mao was that a guerrilla army could not compete with a regular army in the field. Instead, it must be made of irregulars: peasants and villagers highly trained and organized. For us it was a wholly new approach to warfare, in many cases the reverse of everything we had been taught.

"Pretty good stuff," Barker remarked one night when we were lying on straw mats on the floor of our hut, a candle burning between us. "This business about the guerrilla commander being like a fisherman casting his net wide and drawing it in tight again. . . the fellow's a poet."

"He's a damn commie," I grunted.

"But he knows what he's talking about," Barker countered.

"All the worse for the rest of us," I said.

"Well, he could be a Jap for all I care, so long as we can use what he says. What do you make of this business about fighting a war of contradictions?"

I rolled onto my side to face him. "The way I see it," I said, "what 'Comrade' Mao is saying is that we have to turn our weaknesses into strengths. We have to stay on the defensive but assume the initiative, take advantage of the terrain and the fact that the Japs are fighting in a foreign country among a hostile population. We have to stay flexible but organized and avoid pitched battles. Most of all, we have to build our credibility and get the people on our side. We fight only when we have the advantage, but we don't take on the enemy directly."

Barker raised an index finger professorially. "Exactly. We attack only when we know we can win; otherwise, we stay low and concentrate on organizing, gathering intelligence, and sabotage."

"It's all his political stuff I don't swallow," I said. "Our job isn't to start a revolution, it's to prepare for MacArthur's invasion. We're military men, not politicians."

"That's what Mao calls the purely military viewpoint," Barker said with mock admonition. "It's heresy."

"For a professional soldier, it's dogma," I grumbled. "Though God knows there's precious few of them around."

Barker opened the book to the page he had been studying. "Listen to this," he said, and he negan reading in his lilting Alabama accent: "The regular officers assigned to the guerrilla forces should shoulder this sacred task conscientiously, and they should not think their status lowered because they fight fewer big battles and for the time being do not appear as national heroes. Any such thinking is wrong. Guerrilla warfare does not bring as quick results or as great renown as regular warfare, but a long road tests a horse's strength, and a long task proves a man's heart." He glanced up triumphantly. "He goes instinctively for the equine metaphor. Maybe Mao's a cavalryman."

I rolled over onto my back. "And maybe he's just a horse's ass," I said.

Barker blew out the candle. I settled myself on the mat, and as I slipped into sleep I could not help but wonder what sort of a war this was in which a West Point graduate and Southern gentleman, dressed in a uniform of rags and lying in a jungle hit, read from the works a Chinese Communist revolutionary about tactics, logistics, and the philosophy of the human heart. (Ibid., pp 11-113)


In time, Thorp was captured by the Japanese and Barker took over the entire area of operations, leaving Ramsey to run the East Central Luzon Guerrilla Force. This perforce led Joe Barker to make dangerous trips to Manila to organize espionage and sabotage activities there. Barker brought to the entire guerrilla enterprise an energy and competence that Thorp had lacked. His force grew and grew again. The Japanese became alarmed at Barker's successes and redoubled their efforts to find and eliminate him.

In the middle of all this, Barker found time to put out an underground newspaper in English and Tagalog called the "Liberty News." A surviving edition dated 6 December 1942 declares it the "organ of the USAFFE Liberty Crusade," its place of publication, "In the Field." In a box at the left and right are the words, "Give me liberty, or give me death!" The feature article reads in part:

"The time is fast approaching when you the people of Luzon will be able to free yourselves from the cruel oppressors who have attempted to enslave you. The rising tide of victories over the Axis powers is growing every day. Here in Luzon, every city, town, or barrio has its fighting guerrilla unit and in some provinces they have virtually eliminated the Japanese soldiers by sniping along the roads and in the towns. These guerrilla forces of Luzon headed by American officers left here for the purpose by General MacArthur are composed of brave men who have sworn to wage unremitting war on the enemy. To them I send greetings and congratulations from the High Command. To those of you people of Luzon -- be you man or woman, young or old -- who have not yet joined the movement, I beseech that you arm yourselves and join the local unit at once so that when the day comes you will be ready to rise up and destroy the enemy. To the ill-fated Japanese soldiers I say what they have already found out: The people of Luzon would rather be dead than be your slaves." -- Captain Joseph R. Barker II.

Finally, on 14 January 1943, Joe Barker's luck ran out. Betrayed by his bodyguard, Joe was taken while asleep and sent to Santiago Prison where he remained, under torture, for eight and a half months. He was transferred to Bilibid Prison about 1 October. In the nine months that Joe Barker was a guerrilla commander, he managed to grow his secret army into more than 20,000 fighters, support troops and spies. There may have been as many as twice that many. Many outlived him and provided critical support to our landings on Luzon in 1944. But his finest hour came after he was taken, tortured and beaten almost to death a half-dozen times or more. From the eulogy by Reverend Edmonds at the time of the award of the Distinguished Service Cross in 1947:

One (witness) reports seeing him in Santiago Prison where he was in a cell three by three by five opening only on an underground passage through a window a foot square. Joe said: "Keep fighting." Col. Santos writes: "When we left Barker in Ft. Santiago he was already thin and emaciated. While we were leaving . . . he was signaling 'Thumbs up.' 'Thumbs up.'" Every voice that has spoken of his behaviour in prison has echoed the statement of Commodore Hersey: "Captain Barker was utterly defiant toward his captors. Though his attitude increased the hardships of his confinement it had the effect of bolstering up the morale of the other prisoners. His example enabled a lot of them to resist torture." He and Col. Thorp were taken out, manacled, and told to speak to the Filipinos. "Joe spoke: . . .'I am a prisoner of war. Our Commanding Officer has commanded us to cease firing and I know my duty. The war is not over. Let us hope for the best.'" On his refusal to tell the whereabouts of his comrades or to broadcast his guerrillas to surrender, his jailors laid his head on a block and said they would kill him. He answered: "I'd rather die than go home ashamed." Another quotes these words from him: "Only those who are willing to die are fit to live." One writes: "Joe was too much the West Pointer that he would not even lie to the Japanese. He simply said nothing." The order went out to bow to the conquerors. Joe never bowed. Father Duffy, Chaplain of the 26th, saw him in Bilibid Prison and wrote in carefully chosen ecclesiastical language: "He was the same old grand Joe Barker that every one loved and if he'd had half a chance he'd have torn all the lousy Nip guards to pieces. The enemy admired him and his spirit. They also feared him. They knew his spirit could not be broken."

On 8 October 1943, Joe Barker was taken from Bilibid Prison with Lt. Col. Thorp and about ten others, trucked to Manila's old Chinese cemetery, where they were made to dig their own graves, then one by one, they were beheaded. The grave was unmarked, and its location uncertain.

Joe Barker was 28 and he would never see Birmingham and his family again.

After the war, a last letter to his family, including a living will, made its way to the house on Milner Crescent. Written at Guagua, Luzon, it was dated 14 September 1942:

Dear Family,

I am writing this while sitting in a clump of bamboo where I am hiding from a Japanese patrol which is searching the barrio for me. It is cool and quiet here. I will give this note to a friend of mine asking him to preserve it till the end of the war and then send it on its way.

I was with my regiment till the end of Bataan; we fought in practically every battle and I was in them all. When the surrender came I did not surrender. I hid in the mountains and worked my way across the lines. On April 27th (three weeks after the surrender) I found Col. Thorp and turned in to him for duty. Acting under his authority I have spent the rest of my time organizing guerrillas and now have many thousands. During the last few weeks this work has brought me into more dangerous places and nore risky barrios than thos of the Zambola Mountains. I am trying to secure passage to Australia so as to be able to inform General MacArthur of our progress and of the enemy force here. This is a dangerous undertaking -- hence this letter.

If I do not come back, here is my will. . . (redacted).

My service in in the war has been very much to my liking. It has been a pleasure to do my duty and I have not expected to survive even this long. I feel certain that had I surrendered I should have been dead before this time as the Japs have killed either by outright brutal murder of prisoners or by lack of food and medicine most of those who turned in -- according to the reports we have received.

I could retake the Island now with the guerrilla forces at hand but do not want to do it as we could not hold out long without aid and it would only give the Japs fresh excuse for the slaughter of innocent civilians and women and children. We have enough of that as it is.

I will be very sorry if I do not get to see you all again. Never has there been such a wonderful family. I know that you would do the same as I have done under these circumstances.

All in all I am very happy about everything except the possibility of losing you.

The wind makes a nice swishy sound passing through my bamboo. There is a beautiful sunset.


So if you have no one to pause and remember this day, no one to mark their grave with an American flag, stop and give a few moments to remember Captain Joseph Rhett Barker, II. No one deserves it more. And remember, please, the words that are in truth his epitaph, though he lacks a gravestone: "Only those who are willing to die are fit to live."

The Manila Chinese Cemetery (founded in 1879), the second oldest cemetery in Manila. During the Second World War, the Japanese turned it into a bloody execution spot--a killing field. Joe Barker was beheaded and dumped in an unmarked grave here.

How Collectivists Celebrate Memorial Day

In The Killing Zone, one of the best Vietnam War memoirs, Frederick Downs opens with this preface:

In the fall of 1968, as I stopped at a traffic light on my walk to class across the campus of the University of Denver, a man stepped up to me and said, "Hi."

Without waiting for my reply to his greeting, he pointed to the hook sticking out of my left sleeve. "Get that in Vietnam?"

I said, "Yeah, up near Tam Ky in I Corps."

"Serves you right."

As the man walked away, I stood rooted, too confused with hurt, shame, and anger to react.


I was reminded of this when I read the following leftist jeremiad about Memorial Day. Read it and we'll talk more on the other side.

Mourn! Not Honor!, Our Dying in Dishonorable, Murderous Wars

by Jay Janson

On Memorial Day, while our family and friends mourn our absence, conglomerate owned media, after having used our patriotism to have us fight unjust wars based on lies, now hypes our inglorious death as beautiful military service, blacking out media’s having deceived us into participating in senseless massacres of millions of civilians over the last 60 years.

Those who mourn us as fallen comrades, do so in bitter heartbreak and anger. For more than a half century, all of us veterans, both living and dead, were tricked into disservice to our country and humanity, while only some of us paid for our ignorance and innocence with our lives.

And whether we gave our lives in that good war against the fascism that American industrialists and bankers seeking huge profits helped build up, or died during the invasion and occupation of Iraq, which candidate Obama called “a dumb war,” our politicians pat our families on the back with equal thanks.

For whether we died fighting the powerful land, sea and air forces that had attacked and declared war on our country, or died after being lied to and deceived into committing war crimes against near defenseless nations, it makes no difference to Wall Street. The Street makes money either way, from ‘good' war or any war, and the death and destruction war brings.

Whether we lose a war, after murdering millions of Vietnamese, Laotians and Cambodians, or stalemate, after bringing death to a couple million Koreans, our deaths are considered to have contributed to saving all those millions from having to live under communist governments. (However, we note that our government today, ironically enjoys lucrative trade, and has the warm relations, with the communist governments of China and Vietnam.)

Whether some hundreds of us died killing Afghanis in Afghanistan to be better able to chase the Saudi Arabian, Bin Laden, and failed to find him, or merely a dozen of us fell during the manslaughter of a thousand Panamanians, who stood in the way of our successful capture of their former CIA drug dealing President, we receive the same gratitude from the industrial-military-complex via commercial TV programing.

Whether we were two dozen, dying during our invasion of the Dominican Republic to prevent the restoration of democracy and their elected but overthrown President, or three hundred blown away in our sleep by a suicide truck bomber in Lebanon, we all died in government issued clothes and were worthy of a thank you from the Presidential advisors whose plans our commanding generals were carrying out.

Whether we fell serving atrocities happening before our very eyes or were victims of errant friendly fire, we receive the same level of appreciation from politicians and media holding us up as exemplary, to entice recruits to aspire to similar glorification from their peers and society.

(The capitalist establishment, needing predatory war for resources and financial domination, fears Albert Einstein’s menacing prediction that war will end when people refuse to fight.)

Confronted with constant indoctrination to love of war by fear promoting corporate mass disinformation media, veterans, who have survived must remember that we who have paid the highly profiled ‘ultimate sacrifice’ [read threw away our lives for worst than nil], are f--king pissed watching from our graves as criminal media portrays us as just so God damned happy to have forgoed forty or fifty years of mornings, love, friendship, sunsets, and the sheer exhilaration of being alive, to have been shot like pig in a poke or shredded by some stupid land mine, so some mentally challenged moral failures as a human beings CEOs can play with their soldiers, maps and derivatives earning charts.

And just one more thing. Tell that dippy ‘why me worry,’ American public with its finger up its anus: ‘You are responsible for the murderous crimes of your government. You, yes, you, the American entertainment/news advertising TV mesmerized glued to your desperate personal lives citizenry. You are responsible for all the death of the millions we were ordered to kill. Your President is just one public servant, don’t shrug your responsibility off on him.

So on Memorial Days don’t focus obsequiously on us. We paid both the price of our ignorance and your indifference to your citizen responsibilities. Apart from the loving attention of our dear families and acquaintances, we despise your media anchors interest in ‘honoring’ our cadavers.

For Christ’s sake, join the human race and mourn the people we were sent to kill but fell in love with before dying because of your indifference. Those millions that were victims of our wars were our, and your, brothers and sisters and their dead children are now ours more than theirs.

To properly mourn these children, now our children, get to know the culture of their beloved parents. Before we died we realized that their love of family, is head and shoulders above American family values - if for no other reason, because their roots and cultural education goes back much much further than our mere three hundred years of U.S. composite adolescent culture, currently under relentless threat of further commercialization.

We promise you, it will do you good to love them as we came to find them lovable, and realize our, your, government’s extreme cruelty.

On Memorial Day, we would like you to stand above our buried bodies, and pledge to stop being imperialists and stop imperialist war, as Martin Luther King Jr. demanded. Then no one will call America ‘The Great Satan’, nor suicide themselves just to take some of us along with them to a better world.

Mourn the children, their parents and relatives, and then, and only then, mourn us, and for us, please mourn our perceived enemy’s losses as well. If not in your name or ours, then in the name of Jesus, Muhammad, Buddha and who ever else taught compassion as healthy and wise behavior.

Save the use of the words ‘honor’ and ‘praise’ for someone like Muhammad Ali, who refused to do what we, for all our good intentions, unfortunately, went along with.


This is not the first time Janson has sung this song, check this out from January, where he takes Obama to task for praising Vietnam veterans in his inaugural.


Mr. President, They Did Not Die For Us When Killing Vietnamese in Khe Sahn, Vietnam

Source: OpEdNews (1-21-09)

Dear President Obama,

In your inaugural address you said, "For us, they fought and died in places like Concord and Gettysburg, Normandy and Khe Sahn"

Mr. President, beg to correct. They did not die for us, or anyone else, while they were killing Vietnamese in Khe Sahn, Vietnam! They were shaming us and their country. And afterwards, most veterans were angry for having been deceived.

You will remember, when, during the Democratic debates, your elder, Senator Gravel, stated emphatically, "Our soldiers in Vietnam died in vain, and today they are dying in in vain in Iraq."

Martin Luther King Jr. was surely assassinated for condemning the Vietnam War as a long atrocity within a murderous foreign policy all around the world. So testified a young John Kerry, and Muhammad Ali gave up his title to do the right thing refusing to go.

Mr. President, if America is to change in the future, don't Americans have to be honest about their past. As President-elect, you praised an appointee for having "served his country in Vietnam"? Mr. President, three million Vietnamese died in their own country, many killed in their very own homes. Why praise participation in that imperialist war on an innocent colonial people that had looked up their American ally against the Japanese?

Yours truly, was during eight years in the 1990s, Assistant Conductor of the Vietnam Symphony Orchestra in Hanoi and on tour - playing all four Brahms symphonies, and Beethoven, Prokovieff, Shostakovitch, Haydn, Mozart, Tchaikovsky, Rachmaninov, both Chopin concertos with the only Asian winner of the Moscow Tchaikovsky Piano Competition, Dan Tai-son, who practiced for it in a Hanoi bomb shelter.

Every musician in the orchestra lost family, "killed by the Americans,"they would answer simply, with Buddhist un-accusing acceptance.

The orchestra was founded by Ho Chi Minh, and it plays most of its concerts in the Opera House, a diminutive copy of the Paris Opera, where in 1945, our ally Ho, from a balcony overlooking the large square and flanked by an American Major and a British Colonel, declared Vietnam independent.

Next October, the New York Philharmonic will perform in this Hanoi concert hall.

Mr. President, what kind of a message were you sending to the Vietnamese in your mentioning the dying in Vietnam was for America? You know we dropped double the tonnage of all the bombs dropped in World War Two on them.

The President did not say they died for us in Fujulla, Iraq, because candidate Obama bravely spoke out against that horrible war ordered by Bush and supported by Senator Clinton.

Would like to hope that calling attention to Khe Sahn, Vietnam in the President's speech was an oversight, but this praise of the Vietnam war comes right after his silence at the slaughter of the six hundred children of Gaza by American made bombs and planes.

Would that the president could make use of the continuing support of Veterans For Peace. There is a lot of apprehension of your possibly continuing a belligerent foreign policy due to the record of various cabinet members.

We will see a change in the government's bloody foreign policies, when enough citizens feel properly guilty for their nation's crimes against humanity, put themselves in shoes of the bereaved families of Koreans, Vietnamese, Laotians, Cambodians, Iraqis and Afghanis, Panamanians. Could we even imagine such bombings upon US towns and countryside? We can improve the whole world and ourselves with such imagination, or at least take serious their individual portion of the collective accountability, responsibility for the actions of their government in its unlawful use of America's military power in their name.

That is what we enshrined in the Nuremberg trials. We held Germans responsible and the Germans benefited greatly from accepting responsibility

Appreciative of your promises, and expecting your help,
At your service - faithfully,

Jay Janson, Veterans For Peace


"Yours truly, was during eight years in the 1990s, Assistant Conductor of the Vietnam Symphony Orchestra in Hanoi."

Hmmm. Janson says he's a veteran, but is somewhat squeamish about mentioning his actual service. His bio on OpEd News doesn't mention it, saying only:

Musician and writer, who has lived and worked on all the continents and whose articles on media have been published in China, Italy, England and the US, and now resides in New York City.

He says here that he was 70 years of age, making him now 72. He also says:

Six of my bunkmates in basic training are buried in North Korea. I can shed tears for them, they were young men — they wanted to live just as all the Korean relatives of my Korean students would have rather lived than die in a war over the economic confrontation of our country with the Soviet Union.

Uh huh. Well, if he did fight the communist North Koreans in the 1950s, he apparently holds them no ill will, declaring here "Obama Calls on U.N. to Punish North Korea Over Rocket, But Who Punishes The U.S.?"

Obama has called for the United Nations to punish North Korea for its rocket launch. Has North Korea not been punished enough? New and greater saanctions are called for by Obama. When is the U.S. ever punished for its transgressions against humanity?

Obama said the invasion of Iraq was "dumb." Who punishes the U.S. for the nearly one million Iranians dead and a greater number of maimed?

Who punishes the U.S. for five million deaths in the invasion and the effects of the carpet bombings of the colonial populations of French Indochina.

North Korea was bombed to rubble by the U.S. which also leveled almost every town in South Korea to prevent the overthrow of the U.S. sponsored Rhee dictatorship (Rhee was forced to flee the country a few years after the war anyway). The war had been over, the North having won easily except for the final city of Pusan when the U.S. invaded subsequently punishing Korea with millions of casualties. The U.S. can never
be punished.

Not many years ago, the president of a civilian government in South Korea apologized to its people for the massacres that happened there even years after the U.S. 'police action' was over. (War was never declared by Congress on North Korea.)


I guess he doesn't go to many unit reunions these days. I don't blame him. His opinions wouldn't be very popular there.

Real Korean War veterans, the kind I grew up listening to late nights at my Dad's beer bashes when they thought all the wives and kids were asleep, remembered the Korean War rather differently. They remembered things like this:

American POW executed by North Korean People's Army, 1950.

Maybe this is one of Janson's dead Army buddies. Or maybe they died at the hands of the NKPA in the Sunchon Tunnel Massacre in October, 1950, when the fall of Pyongyang appeared imminent, about 180 American POWs were loaded into open railroad cars for transport northward. These men were survivors of the Seoul-Pyongyang death march and were weak from lack of food, water, and medical care. They rode unprotected in the raw climate for 4 or 5 days, arriving at the Sunchon tunnel on October 30, 1950. Late in the afternoon, the prisoners were taken from the railroad cars in alternate groups of approximately 40 to nearby ravines, ostensibly to receive their first food in several days. There they were ruthlessly shot by North Korean soldiers, using Russian burp guns. One hundred and thirty-eight American soldiers lost their lives in this atrocity.

Or maybe they were victims of the Taejon Massacre, 27 September 1950, when about 60 American POWs who had been confined in Taejon prison were taken into the prison yard in groups of 14, with their hands wired together. Forced to sit hunched in hastily dug ditches, they were then shot by NKPA soldiers at point blank range, with American M-1 rifles, using armor-piercing ammunition. Of the 2 seriously wounded survivors, only 1 lived to tell the tale.

Or maybe they were among the five American airmen in a truck convoy were ambushed by North Korean forces in December of 1950 whose bodies, discovered shortly after by a South Korean patrol, showed that their flesh had been punctured in as many as 20 different areas with heated, sharpened bamboo sticks. Said an Air Force surgeon who examined the bodies, the torture was so fiendish that no one perforation was sufficient to cause death by itself.

Or maybe they were victims of the Naedae murders on 13 October 1950 where 12 captured GIs were shot without warning by North Koreans. Although wounded, five managed to survive by feigning death. Ironically, the killings took place in front of a Communist propaganda bulletin board showing posters condemning alleged United Nations war atrocities.

Or maybe they died in the Chaplain-Medic Massacre where NKPA troops slaughtered approximately 20 seriously wounded American soldiers. These soldiers were being administered aid by the regimental surgeon wearing the Red Cross armband, and an Army chaplain wearing the Christian cross, neither of whom were armed. The Communists killed the Chaplain but the surgeon, although wounded, managed to survive and escape.

Or maybe they were among the patrol of 13 GIs ambushed and captured by a large force of North Koreans near Kaesong on 6 November 1950. The prisoners were stripped of their belongings and taken to a small hut, where they were confined for about 3 hours. They were then ordered to march about two miles when they were shot without warning from behind. One survived by feigning death.

The lessons of those atrocities were the ones that my father's friends took away from Korea. The memories haunted their nightmares for years afterward. They, the fallen and the survivors, are the ones we should remember this Memorial Day.

And piss on collectivists like Jay Janson. It is apparent from his quote above that he would have rather that South Korea been subjugated under the Communist boot.

This is the convicting sentence:

The war had been over, the North having won easily except for the final city of Pusan when the U.S. invaded subsequently punishing Korea with millions of casualties.

That tells you all you need to know about who he really worships. So don't believe his crocodile tears spilled for innocents caught in wars. If they were killed by Communists, they would be merely excusable adjuncts of the people's war.

Janson is a "Veteran for Peace" all right -- the peace of the grave. Collectivists always define peace as the absence of opposition.

Memorial Day to Janson is just another excuse to bash America in furtherance of the "international class struggle." He won't use words like that, but it is nonetheless true.

And that, dear friends, is how collectivists celebrate Memorial day.

LATER: I emailed Janson, asking where and when he served.

----- Original Message -----
To: Jay Janson
From: Mike Vanderboegh
Sent: Monday, May 25, 2009 12:22:21 PM

I see you are a member of Veterans for Peace. Where and when did you serve?

Mike Vanderboegh


This is what I received in return --

Date Sent: 05/25/2009
Subject: Served Capitalist Imperialism during Korea 'police action"

Message: None.

The Leader Speaks

A. Hitler

My thanks to wretched dog for sending me this. It is instructive to say the least.

Mike
III

Aside from the fact that we aren’t actually suffering an economic debacle of Depression severity (yet), this could have been Obama….

The Leader Speaks

It was March, 1933. The national mood was feverish and yet expectant. In the wake of his sweeping election victory, the country’s charismatic new leader addressed a people desperate for change. Millions crowded around their radios to hear him. What they heard was a damning indictment of what had gone before and a stirring call for national revival.

In somber tones, he began with a survey [of] the country’s dire economic predicament:

Values have shrunken to fantastic levels; taxes have risen; our ability to pay has fallen; government of all kinds is faced by serious curtailment of income; the means of exchange are frozen in the currents of trade; the withered leaves of industrial enterprise lie on every side; farmers find no markets for their produce; the savings of many years in thousands of families are gone. More important, a host of unemployed citizens face the grim problem of existence, and an equally great number toil with little return.

B. Mussolini

Who was to blame? He left his audience in no doubt. It was ‘the rulers of the exchange of mankind’s goods… through their own stubbornness and their own incompetence’. But the ‘practices of the unscrupulous money changers’ now stood ‘indicted in the court of public opinion’; they had been ‘rejected by the hearts and minds of men’:

Faced by failure of credit, they have proposed only the lending of more money. Stripped of the lure of profit by which to induce our people to follow their false leadership, they have resorted to exhortations, pleading tearfully for restored confidence. They know only the rules of a generation of self-seekers. They have no vision, and when there is no vision the people perish. The money changers have fled from their high seats in the temple of our civilization. We may now restore that temple to the ancient truths. {Applause] The measure of the restoration lies in the extent to which we apply social values more noble than mere monetary profit.

This was strong language, indeed, but there was more to come. Contrasting ‘the falsity of material wealth’ with ‘the joy and moral stimulation of work’, he inveighed against ‘the standards of pride of place and personal profit’, to say nothing of the ‘callous and selfish wrong-doing’ that had come to characterize both financial and political life. ‘This Nation’, he declared to further applause, ‘asks for action, and action now.’

The action the new leader had in mind was bold, even revolutionary. Jobs would be created by ‘direct recruiting by the government itself, treating the task as we would treat the emergency of a war’; men would be put to work on ‘greatly needed projects to stimulate and reorganize the use of our natural resources’. At the same time, to correct what he called ‘the overbalance of population in our industrial centres’, there would be a ‘redistribution’ of the workforce ‘to provide a better use of the land for those best fitted for the land’. He would introduce a system of ‘national planning for the supervision of all forms transportation and of communications and other utilities’ and ‘a strict supervision of all banking and credits and investments’ to bring ‘an end to speculation with other people’s money’ – measures that won enthusiastic cheers from his audience. The country’s ‘international trade relations’ would have to take a second place to ‘the establishment of a sound national economy’. ‘We must move’, he declared, his voice now rising to a climax,

as a trained and loyal army willing to sacrifice for the good of a common discipline, because without such discipline no progress is made, no leadership becomes effective. We are, I know, ready and willing to submit our lives and property to such discipline, because it makes possible a leadership which aims at a larger good. This I propose to offer, pledging that the larger purposes will bind upon us all as a sacred obligation with a unity of duty hitherto evoked only in time of armed strife. With this pledge taken, I assume unhesitatingly the leadership of this great army of our people dedicated to a disciplined attack upon our common problems.

H. Tojo


Not content with this vision of a militarized nation, he concluded with a stark warning to the nation’s newly elected legislature” ‘An unprecedented demand and need for undelayed action may call for temporary departure from… the normal balance of executive and legislative authority’. If the legislature did not swiftly pass the measures he proposed to deal with the national emergency, he demanded ‘the one remaining instrument to meet the crisis – broad Executive power to wage a war against the emergency, as great as the power that would be given to me if we were in fact invaded by a foreign foe’. This line brought forth the loudest applause of all.

Who was this demagogue who so crudely blamed the Depression on corrupt financiers, who so boldly proposed state intervention as a the cure for unemployment, who so brazenly threatened to rule by decree if the legislature did not back him, who so cynically used and re-used the words ‘people’ and ‘Nation’ to stroke up the patriotic sentiments of his audience?

The answer is Franklin D. Roosevelt, and the speech from which all the above quotations are taken was his inaugural address as he assumed the American presidency on march 4, 1933.

Above excerpted from Niall Ferguson’s The War of the World: Twentieth-Century Conflict and the Descent of the West; Penguin Books, New York, New York, pp. 221-223.


F. Roosevelt

The Predictable Consequence of Waco Rules: "You can discover what your enemy fears most by observing the means he uses to frighten you."


Forgive me for disturbing your Memorial Day, but this subject needs to be addressed in a timely fashion.

Jackie Junti sends the link to a Seattle Times story below, with her comments, including a quote from Eric Hoffer: "You can discover what your enemy fears most by observing the means he uses to frighten you."

According to the story, people in black robes are getting frightened. Given outrages of justice such as the Olofson case, I reckon they have a right to be.

I have long contended, attempting to warn those who think the Leviathan can act with impunity, that if the law and the Constitution no longer protect us, then it no longer protects them either. This is the predictable consequence of Waco Rules, reinforced by the object lesson of the blatant framing of David Olofson. Why, if we cannot expect a fair trial in federal court, SHOULD we respect federal judges? There is certainly no incentive to do so.

And if federal judges have the long-term memory of a fruit fly, many American citizens remember what they do not. They have forgotten the Original Sin of Waco, but we have not.

They have forgotten the multiple miscarriages of justice that characterized that federal massacre of citizens at the hands of their own government, but we have not.

They have forgotten that no one in the federal constabulary or the Mandarin class of politicians and judges was ever held to account for it, but we have not.

They have forgotten it because they wish to forget it, but we who wish to remain free cannot.

Even sixteen years later, therefore, Waco is not an unfortunate scar upon the body politic as some would conveniently believe, it is an oozing abscess that still threatens to become a deadly systemic infection.

You see, we remember why the FBI chose to conclude the stand-off with an assault on 19 April, the birthday of Eliot Ness, the ATF's patron saint.

We remember why, even as the flames leaped over the funeral pyre of dead babies, that the FBI went in and raised an ATF flag with four stars on it -- marking the four dead ATF agents who died in the original assault.

We understand the message the FBI was sending -- WE are the Leviathan. YOU do not DARE kill any of US, even in legitimate self-defense (which is what a Texas jury later found it to be) without being paid back 20 to 1, even if that means we asphyxiate and burn your women and children along with you.

If we believe Eric Hoffer, the FBI has shown us what the Leviathan fears -- death, personal or impersonal as your perspective might be -- death at twenty of them to every one of their victims.

Can we then expect, as the Gangster Government grows more rapacious and its depredations upon life, liberty and property grow more widespread and tyrannical, and the opportunities for redress within the system become fewer to the point of becoming a bad joke of mythical memory, that employees of that criminal gang will NOT be assassinated?

I do not advocate the assassination of federal employees, but given the twin abscesses of Waco Rules and now Olofson Rules, I understand the thought process.

To quote a contemporary California neighbor of Eric Hoffer's, the equally celebrated American thinker Frank Zappa:

Do you love it?
Do you hate it it?
There it is,
The way you made it.

This was the point of my recent letter to Eric Holder, who was right in the middle of that horrific crime and cover-up. "There are no more free Wacos," I said. The article below just underscores the point I was trying to make.

Mike Vanderboegh
III

Threats against judges, prosecutors escalate

Threats against the nation's judges and prosecutors have increased sharply, prompting hundreds to get 24-hour protection from armed U.S.S. marshals.

By Jerry Markon

WASHINGTON — Threats against the nation's judges and prosecutors have increased sharply, prompting hundreds to get 24-hour protection from armed U.S. marshals. Many federal judges are altering their routes to work, installing security systems at home, shielding their addresses by paying bills at the courthouse or refraining from registering to vote. Some even pack weapons on the bench.

The problem has become so pronounced that a high-tech "threat management" center opened recently in Arlington, Va., where about 25 marshals and analysts monitor a 24-hour number for reporting threats, use sophisticated mapping software to track those being threatened and tap into a classified database linked to the FBI and CIA.

"I live with a constant heightened sense of awareness," said John Adams, a federal judge in Ohio who began taking firearms classes after a federal judge's family was slain in Chicago and takes a pistol to the courthouse on weekends. "If I'm going to carry a firearm, I'd better know how to use it."

The threats and other harassing communications against federal-court personnel have more than doubled in the past six years, from 592 to 1,278, according to the U.S. Marshals Service.

Worried federal officials blame disgruntled defendants whose anger is fueled by the Internet; terrorism and gang cases that bring more violent offenders into court; frustration at the economic crisis; and the rise of the "sovereign citizen" movement — a loose collection of tax protesters, white supremacists and others who don't respect federal authority.

Much of the concern was fueled by the 2005 slaying of U.S. District Judge Joan Lefkow's husband and mother in their Chicago home and a rampage 11 days later by an Atlanta rape suspect, who killed a judge, the court stenographer and a deputy. Several pipe bombs exploded outside the federal courthouse in San Diego last year, and a drug defendant wielding a razor blade briefly choked a federal prosecutor during sentencing in New York. In March, a homicide suspect attacked a judge in a California courtroom and was shot to death by police.

The Justice Department and FBI continue to investigate the Seattle slaying of Assistant U.S. Attorney Thomas Wales, who was shot Oct. 11, 2001, in the basement of his Queen Anne home. From the outset, investigators suspected a commercial-airline pilot whom Wales had prosecuted in a fraud case because the case continued to generate ill feelings even after charges were dropped. Federal marshals immediately placed another prosecutor in the fraud case under 24-hour guard.

Although attacks on federal-court personnel have not increased, the explosion of vitriolic threats has prompted a growing law-enforcement crackdown aimed at preventing them. The marshals service, which protects judges and prosecutors, says several hundred require 24-hour guard for days, weeks or months each year, depending on the case.

"We have to make sure that every judge and prosecutor can go to work every day and carry out the rule of law," said Michael Prout, assistant director of judicial security for the marshals, who have trained hundreds of police and deputies to better protect local court officials.

"It's the core of our civil liberties," Prout said.

State court officials are seeing the same trend, although no numbers are available. "There's a higher level of anger, whether it's defendants or their families," said Timothy Fautsko, who coordinates security education for the National Center for State Courts in Williamsburg, Va., and said threats come from violent offenders along with divorce, probate and other civil litigants.

Threats are emerging in cases large and small, on the Internet, by telephone, in letters and in person. In Washington, D.C., two men have pleaded not guilty to charges of vowing to kill a federal prosecutor and kidnap her adult son if she didn't drop a homicide investigation. The judge in the CIA leak case received threatening letters when he ordered prison time for I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby, Vice President Dick Cheney's former chief of staff. A man near Richmond, Va., was charged with mailing threats to a prosecutor over three traffic offenses. The face of a federal judge in Washington, D.C., was put in a rifle's cross hairs on the Internet after he issued a controversial environmental ruling, judicial sources said.

Hundreds of threats cascaded into the chambers of John Roll, the chief U.S. district judge in Arizona, in February after he allowed a lawsuit filed by illegal immigrants against a rancher to go forward.

"They cursed him out, threatened to kill his family, said they'd come and take care of him. They really wanted him dead," said a law-enforcement official who heard the calls — which came from as far as Richmond and Baltimore — but spoke on condition of anonymity because no one has been charged.

David Gonzales, a U.S. marshal in Arizona, said deputies put the judge under 24-hour protection for about a month, guarding his home, screening his mail and escorting him to court, to the gym and to Mass.

"Some deputies went to church more in a week than they had in their lives," Gonzales said.

The stress nearly overcame Michael Cicconetti, a municipal-court judge in Painesville, Ohio, after police played a tape for him of a defendant in a minor tax case plotting to blow up the judge's house. Cicconetti evacuated his family for a terrifying week in which they were under guard and stayed at friends' houses.
"I couldn't go to work for two weeks. I was too shaken up. I couldn't think," he said. The judge now has a security system in his home — and a stun gun within reach in court.

Sibley Reynolds, an Alabama state court judge who prosecutors said was threatened last year by the son of a defendant convicted of stealing about $3,000 from a humane shelter, packs the real thing — a Colt automatic pistol. He keeps it under his robe, in his waistband.

"I don't go anywhere without my security with me," Reynolds said.

Court officials could not say how often judges arm themselves. But the marshals have installed home-security systems for most federal judges since the Lefkow incident, and many are removing their photos from court Web sites and shielding their home addresses.

The Judicial Conference of the United States, the policymaking arm headed by the Supreme Court chief justice, soon will distribute a DVD with security tips. It will be called Project 365, for security 365 days a year.

"Judges today are far more security-conscious than they ever have been," said Henry Hudson, a federal judge in Richmond who is working on the DVD. "I don't think it's at the point where it's interfering with their judgment and dedication to their jobs."