No logic, just feeeeelings. Mike is certain that more laws for the law-abiding would have prevented the criminal from committing his crime. For the children, of course.
No comment section - I was going to ask him how many kids would have been saved if any of those teachers at Newtown had been armed. But I guess that would have been wasted on him because he obviously doesn't think.
It's really too bad that our guns serve to protect not only the sane, but also numbnuts like him.
In the wake of sandy hook more people went out and bought guns then the number of people who demanded guns to be banned. One could assume that people fear their government more than a crazy lone shooter. Of course this can't be explained to this person because there are no comments allowed. Which is typical of evil people. They don't want to hear the truth they only want you to obey what they tell you.
I have YET to hear a single collectivist explain to me why criminals (who by definition don't obey laws) would somehow be stopped by additional laws on guns.
As you've succinctly stated, Mike, "If you try to take our guns, we'll kill you."
My wife and I have reached that point. I'm not interested in more blather from intellectually flaccid collectivists. No more talk, no more compromises, no more games. Just bought more .45 JHP for a good price. Ain't Walmart great?
BTW Mike, if you're still searching for 22LR let me know. Don't have a lot, but enough to send some to you if you need it.
I really, really wish I could have gotten up the motivation to link and read this Progressive Libtard shit. But I couldn't. I could feeeeeel my IQ dropping while reading just the posted intro. Dear Whoever-You-Are, I hereby bless you with a new name, Facq-heem.
Thanks for giving me another name to add to the "tyrants-due-for-trial" list.And he's from what's called " The Picture Newspaper". Just like a comic book..
"...until Adam Lanza walked into her school on a Friday morning with an automatic weapon — the kind of gun we are told must be protected or the Second Amendment is turned into a dishrag — and started shooting."
Adam Lanza didn't have an automatic weapon, did he? Thought they were semi-automatic.
The NY Daily News should know better than to print this. When will the media be held to account?
10 comments:
No logic, just feeeeelings. Mike is certain that more laws for the law-abiding would have prevented the criminal from committing his crime. For the children, of course.
No comment section - I was going to ask him how many kids would have been saved if any of those teachers at Newtown had been armed. But I guess that would have been wasted on him because he obviously doesn't think.
It's really too bad that our guns serve to protect not only the sane, but also numbnuts like him.
No comments allowed, either. I wonder why... /sarc
Sure a lot of shootings in 'gun controlled' NYC.
Two buckets of purely I optional, illogical tripe.
In the wake of sandy hook more people went out and bought guns then the number of people who demanded guns to be banned. One could assume that people fear their government more than a crazy lone shooter. Of course this can't be explained to this person because there are no comments allowed. Which is typical of evil people. They don't want to hear the truth they only want you to obey what they tell you.
I have YET to hear a single collectivist explain to me why criminals (who by definition don't obey laws) would somehow be stopped by additional laws on guns.
As you've succinctly stated, Mike, "If you try to take our guns, we'll kill you."
My wife and I have reached that point. I'm not interested in more blather from intellectually flaccid collectivists. No more talk, no more compromises, no more games. Just bought more .45 JHP for a good price. Ain't Walmart great?
BTW Mike, if you're still searching for 22LR let me know. Don't have a lot, but enough to send some to you if you need it.
C.E.
I really, really wish I could have gotten up the motivation to link and read this Progressive Libtard shit. But I couldn't. I could feeeeeel my IQ dropping while reading just the posted intro.
Dear Whoever-You-Are, I hereby bless you with a new name, Facq-heem.
B Woodman
III-per
Thanks for giving me another name to add to the "tyrants-due-for-trial" list.And he's from what's called " The Picture Newspaper". Just like a comic book..
From the story:
"...until Adam Lanza walked into her school on a Friday morning with an automatic weapon — the kind of gun we are told must be protected or the Second Amendment is turned into a dishrag — and started shooting."
Adam Lanza didn't have an automatic weapon, did he? Thought they were semi-automatic.
The NY Daily News should know better than to print this. When will the media be held to account?
Post a Comment