tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7575061201749703300.post8182112872837385695..comments2024-02-28T20:56:23.768-06:00Comments on Sipsey Street Irregulars: A Brief Three Percent Catechism -- A discipline not for the faint-hearted.Dutchman6http://www.blogger.com/profile/09935420042995679958noreply@blogger.comBlogger22125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7575061201749703300.post-75143385487771317212016-08-14T08:42:58.805-05:002016-08-14T08:42:58.805-05:00The choice is limited and clear... Live III or Die...The choice is limited and clear... <b>Live III or Die!</b>TyranniCull Inc.noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7575061201749703300.post-56574107272170316362015-12-16T18:06:06.584-06:002015-12-16T18:06:06.584-06:00There are too many groups out there that may be li...There are too many groups out there that may be like-minded regarding the core beliefs but are not in alignment regarding when action is necessary. As a retired combat leader, I have seen civil wars in the Balkans after the wall came down in Germany. Action must be taken in measured responses as acting prematurely WILL cede the moral high ground. Moral courage and patience is the key. Knowing what is and is not a threat is critical. The challenge is identifying the point of no return that dictates action.Crusaderhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16620510154643078527noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7575061201749703300.post-68144875919299076132014-07-27T08:35:04.749-05:002014-07-27T08:35:04.749-05:00"If the Confederacy had not fired on Sumter, ..."If the Confederacy had not fired on Sumter, what would Lincoln have done?"<br /><br />He probably would have moved on with the next provocation until he got the results he needed to justify a military incursion on the South. <br /><br />Lookout for another "Bundy" incident. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7575061201749703300.post-22882302190576597372014-07-10T14:16:50.984-05:002014-07-10T14:16:50.984-05:00What about the people at are voting for these tyra...What about the people at are voting for these tyrants? they'll just undo all the hard work and bloodshed in a few years.<br />I can't advocate genocide, but how do you deal with all of the state loving folks?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7575061201749703300.post-89640704435553445832014-07-04T17:59:03.930-05:002014-07-04T17:59:03.930-05:00The "Just War Doctrine," while "hon...The "Just War Doctrine," while "honored more in the breach than the observance," is still the fruit of nearly 1500 years of thinking in Western culture on when and how to conduct war. Part of it is known as "jus in bello," or the just conduct of war. It comes in two parts: discrimination and proportion. Discrimintion means you aim your attacks only at those who are directly opposing you, i.e., the armed forces of the enemy, and their direct military and political commanders. Proportion recognizes that even a discriminating attack may have some unintended spillover, with harm to innocents. Proportion means that the evil result of this unintended spillover must not outweigh the good done by the attack on a legitimate target. If it's very important to eliminate an enemy leader, and the only way you can do it is blow up his house when he, his wife, and his children are home, the unintended death of those innocents may satisfy proportion. Blowing up the house when the wife and children are home, but he is not, violates discrimination. Just War Doctrine would say that's not justified. <br /><br />We're fighting monsters, but we can't afford to become monsters ourselves. Joseph P. Martinohttp://www.book-resistancetotyranny.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7575061201749703300.post-4012997362344924442014-07-02T20:59:06.629-05:002014-07-02T20:59:06.629-05:00People really should avoid defeatism. If they cann...People really should avoid defeatism. If they cannot help but indulge in it, they ought to leave the field and sell their guns.<br /><br />"The Three Percent are the citizens the Founders counted on to save the Republic when everyone else abandoned it."<br /><br />Not quite. The Republic did not exist during the Revolution; multiple republics allied under the Articles of Confederation did (and even that started after the war began). Anyway I don't like to make a distinction between the "Founders" and the people who fought. The real founders were the militia, and men such as Sam Adams and Patrick Henry. The "Founders" AKA "Founding Lawyers" were the guys who centralized power in the coup of 1789 and overthrew the Revolution.<br /><br />Also the phrase "...when everyone else abandoned it," makes no sense because it was not there to be abandoned. You might say, "abandoned them" since there were multiple republics...<br /><br />"Thus, we are committed to the restoration of the Founders' Republic..."<br /><br />Well, I certainly am not. I guess I must not be a 3 percenter then, since I am willing to fight and die for liberty rather than republics of any sort, which invariably are opposed to liberty. I would be willing to tolerate a republic via "panarchy", in which the ruling class of the republic left me alone. If they won't, I'll be fighting the new republic just like the current oligarchy.Paul Xnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7575061201749703300.post-45533552086360282862014-07-01T09:02:25.533-05:002014-07-01T09:02:25.533-05:00Look Fellas, I get it. Many of you are so frustrat...Look Fellas, I get it. Many of you are so frustrated you are chomping at the bit. So is the OPFOR. However, life is scary enough without makjng your own hypothetical boogymen contaminating your local mall with biohazards.<br /><br />A Leader leads by example. A Leader will show others what "right" looks like. Both metaphorically in spirit and morally as well as physically and mentally a Leader will exemplify these things. It does not matter if you do not think you are a Leader. Others look to you wether you know it or not. <br /><br />A Leader does not advocate, participate, nor allow others to participate in intentional collateral damage. Every person of every background and faith can understand this concept. Like Mike said, if you want to be a despot, look to another ethos. <br /><br />I hear they are hiring for Mutant Biker Gang Henchmen over on Stormfront. Take that shit over there.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7575061201749703300.post-12752376563279532042014-07-01T08:50:58.607-05:002014-07-01T08:50:58.607-05:00There are a lot of assumptions being made here.. m...There are a lot of assumptions being made here.. mostly about how our domestic enemy will act or react.<br /> As defenders we have an absolute and natural right to do whatever is necessary to "defend" ourselves and our liberty.<br />This concept of "collateral damage" is a dogma created by our "other" enemies, the soviets propaganda machine" in the 50's and 60's with their accomplices in our media who planted these treasonous bastards in our midst, communists, to create a false moral responsibility that hinders the response of those being attacked by those they are defending against. Over the decades it has become ingrained into our society to the point that we have allowed ourselves to become ineffective and distracted when engaging the enemy.<br /> Our enemy harbors no such illusions about who or what they will kill or destroy to obtain their victory and our own history has shown that butchery of innocents and, the misnomer of, collateral damage has been one of their main goals in their perpetration of total war and horror. Review the horrors of RVN, the soviets in Afghanistan, the red chinese in Tianamen square against their own citizens..<br /> We cannot allow ourselves to be manipulated into failure because of a self induced limitation created by those same enemies we will soon encounter for the very purpose of our own defeat.<br /> Either we win or we lose.. there can never be conditions, limits or ROE's that limit our ability to defeat an enemy as insidious as what we have allowed to take control of our nation.<br /> We should not start it, ever.. and once it begins no quarter will be given to us. We should not directly target non combatants but their proximity should not hinder or deter an attack ever.. if you disagree with that look how they act now.Yank IIIhttp://yanklll.wordpress.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7575061201749703300.post-55062494312364829442014-06-30T20:33:42.905-05:002014-06-30T20:33:42.905-05:00The days of romantically marching to drum beat and...The days of romantically marching to drum beat and firing muskets in a line are over. It will be hard to maintain the moral high ground when the battle of gettysburg will be like a stroll through disney land on a warm calm day. Our elite will utilize chemical weapons on entire cities and send people into violent spasm and then just frame a patriot group. They control the media so even if we behave 100% ethical we will still be made out to be absolute demon trash. I don't know how you attain the moral high ground when either the mass media is still permitted to operate or modern civilization is shut off and 90% of the population has to start being cannibals in order to survive since less than 10% of the population knows how to produce food and obtain food using means other than walking to the nearest grocery store or 711.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7575061201749703300.post-1370962008779203642014-06-30T20:24:39.116-05:002014-06-30T20:24:39.116-05:00A lot of you guys think 4th generation war is poss...A lot of you guys think 4th generation war is possible. I don't think it is for a number of reasons.<br /><br />The top level elites want 90% of us dead. So if they have to, they just virus bomb the planet and retreat underground and emerge to wipe out the survivors. They have access to technology we don't know about. Tech that could protect them with advanced terminator robots, tech that could probbaly brain wash anyone within a certai radious, etc. We don't know what kind of tech the elite have access to but I think it is silly to think the most advanced tech they have is what we have.<br /><br />In the middle of Civil War 2, who is going to properly care for all of our nuclear power plants and spent fuel pools? Will trucks supplying diesel fuel make it to power the spent fuel pool generators while intense gun fights are going on and our highways are chocked with cars that tried to escape the cities and caused gridlock? At some point, in the midst of chaos all of our nuke plants turn fukishima on us. Fukishima has given our civilization enough headache and that is just one plant with civilization still in tact to deal with it. I have seen almost 0 patriots address what to do when our nuke plants all go critical. We might win the civil war, establish constitutional govenrment, then start puking our guts out and losing our hair. Just like our forefathers, we will be wearing wigs, lol.<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7575061201749703300.post-13455198798881259192014-06-30T18:30:36.672-05:002014-06-30T18:30:36.672-05:00Mike, the demonic scum happily took my wife(at gun...Mike, the demonic scum happily took my wife(at gun point in walmart's parking lot) and both sons.Seems they do not bother with the statutes and are but badged brigands. Month 35 of the ordeal begins.........<br /> Thanx Rick Reese<br />Google Reese family fast and furious scapegoats?Baja Blitzerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09201876200451517997noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7575061201749703300.post-51337705834796689452014-06-30T13:32:06.962-05:002014-06-30T13:32:06.962-05:00I'm going to point out what should be an obvio...I'm going to point out what should be an obvious distinction between the concept of "no targeting of innocents" and "avoiding all collateral damage".<br /><br />When you take a shot, you aim it at the guilty, not the innocent. It's that simple. That doesn't mean that you never take a shot where there might be repercussions from killing the guilty which would adversely affect some innocent. It doesn't mean never taking a shot you might miss if there is any chance you might end up hitting an innocent. It doesn't even mean that you never take a shot that will end up going through the guilty and hitting an innocent (or even never take a shot through an innocent to kill the guilty).<br /><br />It just means that every shot is targeted on the guilty rather than on the innocent. Now, you can adjust your position on how much danger to innocents you'll tolerate, and I think that the circumstances matter. When you are faced with the case of letting some monster abduct and kill an innocent or taking a shot through that innocent's body to kill the monster, I frankly hope that you take the shot. I hope that you have the wisdom and ability to find a third option when there is one, but I know full well that there is not always a third option.<br /><br />Still, a lot of times you can just wait until the monster has killed the innocent and then kill the monster, secure in the knowledge that at least you didn't kill the innocent. That may be a pretty sorry third option, and it isn't always a realistic one, but it does sometimes occur.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7575061201749703300.post-74210502331282218942014-06-30T10:55:37.474-05:002014-06-30T10:55:37.474-05:00Mike, now write your book. Assume in the not-so-di...Mike, now write your book. Assume in the not-so-distant future, this will be hate speech; stricken from the internet.<br /><br />I hope for a hard copy and book tours in your future.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7575061201749703300.post-28533176283581735132014-06-30T09:34:50.807-05:002014-06-30T09:34:50.807-05:00The three percent mantra includes the simplified s...The three percent mantra includes the simplified statement to the Federal government:<br />"If you try to take our guns, we will kill you".<br /><br />Considering the lefts agenda, it should also contain this;<br />" If you continue to push, drive, lie and coerce us into accepting a tyrannical, socialist police state, we will kill you".Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7575061201749703300.post-40728507877502213052014-06-29T14:34:19.091-05:002014-06-29T14:34:19.091-05:00@Dutchman: "The hausfrau and kinder are off l...@Dutchman: "The hausfrau and kinder are off limits."<br /><br />No offense, but they never have been before. They're always legit targets, they're just targeted by other means in modern warfare. Spaatz, LeMay, and Harris bombed the bejesus out of them in Germany and Japan. Naval blockades starved them in WWI and WWII. Grant starved 'em at Vicksburg; the Feds starved 'em all through the South. Hell - starvation is always a popular weapon to use against them - it's just given the name "breaking the enemy's will to resist" as window dressing.<br /><br />In the end, whenever a fight get serious enough, everyone ends up being a target, directly or indirectly. It's just the way of things, unfortunately.Jimmy the Saintnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7575061201749703300.post-9522800675744562522014-06-29T14:21:11.727-05:002014-06-29T14:21:11.727-05:00Parker at Lexington may have told his men not to ...Parker at Lexington may have told his men not to fire first, but make no mistake, there had been an awful lot of people (e.g., the Sons of Liberty) engaged in activity designed to goad the British into firing. Not necessarily at that particular date and time, but the intent was definitely to pick a fight.<br /><br />And firing first doesn't negate the worthiness of your cause if it is clear that the conflict can no longer be avoided. Remember, for example, it was the Americans who fired first at Pearl Harbor.Jimmy the Saintnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7575061201749703300.post-8955623057896564422014-06-29T12:40:07.319-05:002014-06-29T12:40:07.319-05:00Third to final paragraph: " If the order-give...Third to final paragraph: " If the order-givers start to disappear, through death or desertion, the orders do get given."<br /><br />I think you're missing a "not", but brilliant essay otherwise. Thanks.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7575061201749703300.post-32050393525848078662014-06-29T09:29:44.642-05:002014-06-29T09:29:44.642-05:00Dragonmouse -- The hausfrau and kinder are off li...Dragonmouse -- The hausfrau and kinder are off limits. That is the seductivity of evil. If you don't draw the bright line at the evil actor themselves then pretty soon you're blowing up day care centers. That's just the way it is. Hutus and Tutsis could tell you the same thing. Besides, I stand by my statement that only their OWN deaths matter to the war-makers and decision takers. Strike the root, not the branch.Dutchman6https://www.blogger.com/profile/09935420042995679958noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7575061201749703300.post-70561296325882860062014-06-29T09:28:23.154-05:002014-06-29T09:28:23.154-05:00Someone asked long ago;
"Who speaks like this...Someone asked long ago;<br />"Who speaks like this man?"<br />It is a different day now, and I find myself wondering; who speaks like this man? You are in good company Mike.<br />iwitness02noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7575061201749703300.post-75513354532772092932014-06-29T09:05:49.947-05:002014-06-29T09:05:49.947-05:00Mike,
I wholeheartedly agree and represent such t...Mike,<br /><br />I wholeheartedly agree and represent such to friends family and the world at large. I have an observation wherein the lines are not so clearly drawn and I believe that it goes to the heart of the vast difference of moral character between you and others. Please enlighten me with your thoughts on what is "innocent". Is the spouse of a tyrant who sends him off daily to do battle an innocent? After all she/he, provides daily care, and I propose would defend to the death any attacks on his/her ability to further that tyranny. After all without such tyranny supplying their own lifestyle with its ill-gotten gains what is there for them? Will they be any less of a threat for the death of their provider? Now extend that to their children,immidiate family, extended family, etc. They all in my opinion if providing support are as guilty of that lack of morality as the original. Where is the line? I would hope that simply by asking the question you understand that I simply am struggling to decide where innocence ends and the ultimate intention to win begins. The above examples are just that, examples but the question goes across all that I am or ever hope to be. So who in the end is innocent?<br /> Either way keep up the fight and I will endeavor to stand alongside,and help to find that moral compass Dragonmousenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7575061201749703300.post-48086302466908001992014-06-29T08:41:44.448-05:002014-06-29T08:41:44.448-05:00My only criticism of this was best expressed by Th...My only criticism of this was best expressed by Thomas Sowell in a review of 'The Road To Serfdom'. Talking of socialism and how it naturally devolves he noted "Once you have opened the floodgates you cannot tell the water where to go".<br /><br />There will be civil war should the government try to disarm us, and we will try our utmost to maintain the high ground, but just as surely there will be atrocities and they will not all be on one side. It's the nature of the beast. <br /><br />That's hard to admit but it is no less true. Should the day ever arrive that government employees become targets, those who cook their meals and iron their shirts will have become targets as well. You won't and I won't, but someone will.rexxheadhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12578166996312186309noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7575061201749703300.post-43866456105039412102014-06-29T06:29:14.337-05:002014-06-29T06:29:14.337-05:00Thank you, Mike. This is important. Especially c...Thank you, Mike. This is important. Especially considering the current regime's recent use of the term in their own psyops.Mike in KYnoreply@blogger.com