tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7575061201749703300.post4200873566832695883..comments2024-02-28T20:56:23.768-06:00Comments on Sipsey Street Irregulars: The Intolerable Act: An Analysis of the Pelosi "Health Care" BillDutchman6http://www.blogger.com/profile/09935420042995679958noreply@blogger.comBlogger22125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7575061201749703300.post-77941186596445198482009-11-02T13:12:22.684-06:002009-11-02T13:12:22.684-06:00There are only two ways remaining to get our count...There are only two ways remaining to get our country back. One is through the ballot box and the other is through the bullet box. As long as we keep electing D's and R's instead of those that hold the founders view, we will never recover our country. Sixty plus years of history shows that we would rather submit to Tyrants than use the bullet box.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7575061201749703300.post-36987015515210021692009-11-02T01:39:25.603-06:002009-11-02T01:39:25.603-06:00"It's as if every poll showed massive sup..."<i>It's as if every poll showed massive support for this tyranny instead of massive opposition.</i>"<br /><br />The people who answer polls are still looking to politicians to do something and save them, aren't they? That is massive support.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7575061201749703300.post-51709189652413280822009-11-02T00:30:14.916-06:002009-11-02T00:30:14.916-06:00"God won't save the Republic. It isn'..."God won't save the Republic. It isn't worth saving right now." You made me laugh a bit there friend. But don't say that, how can we be thinking that we are far more better than what God's design is? Remember, all things work together for good to them that Love God.Insurance Estimateshttp://insurance-estimates.blogspot.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7575061201749703300.post-17076957530944081162009-11-01T23:28:18.388-06:002009-11-01T23:28:18.388-06:00Paul B sez:
"There is not one line in the sa...Paul B sez:<br /><br /><b>"There is not one line in the sand for all of us, collectively... There are only individual lines in the sand for each of us,"</b><br /><br />Really? If so, they will pick us off individually, something they actually can, and would much prefer, to do.<br /><br />Anonymous (@ #2) sez:<br /><br />"First and foremost, all those (VERY cogent and factual) arguments miss the most basic point: THEY DO NOT HAVE THE CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY TO DO THIS. Period."<br /><br />Now THERE'S a line in the sand, one the duty to which which has been shirked almost continuously for fifty, sixty, seventy... one hundred and sixty..... years. <br /><br />Is it a "Fort Sumter" if a hundred heads roll in retribution for each federale persecution, each breach of Constitutional authority, each incidence of outright treason?<br /><br />I don't believe in Pyrrhic "victories".aughtsixnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7575061201749703300.post-64099601780786527542009-11-01T11:54:10.997-06:002009-11-01T11:54:10.997-06:00"Waco was a line in the sand. And we did noth..."Waco was a line in the sand. And we did nothing.<br /><br />Olofson's kangaroo railroading should be a line in the sand and, so far, no one has done anything."<br /><br />Waco was a line in the sand for the Branch Davidians. It's wrong to say they did nothing. Olofson's railroading was a line in the sand for Olofson, who decided to trust the system to deliver justice. His bad.<br /><br />There is not one line in the sand for all of us, collectively. Remember, "no Fort Sumters?" There are only individual lines in the sand for each of us, individual reactions to tyranny that we suffer.<br /><br />As to this health bill, "Atlas is about to shrug." See how big and mean the government can get with no economy left to parasitize.Paul Bnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7575061201749703300.post-36584129627703735522009-11-01T02:48:59.269-06:002009-11-01T02:48:59.269-06:00"It's all you 'committed Republicans&..."It's all you 'committed Republicans' who made this a race between tweedle-dee and tweedle-dum."<br /><br />Be careful with the accusations.<br /><br />Remember Rush was able to keep Hillary in the race long past her time by encouraging Republicans in "locked-up" (foregone conclustion as to who would win: McCain, Huckleberry, whatever) states to vote in the Dem primary.<br /><br />Same thing happened to Reps; crossover voters were a big reason we got McCain.<br /><br />I guess you could sat the dems were hedging their bets: if they had to have a republican win the presidency, they wanted it to be McCain. Of course, Palin being chosen put a wrench in that, as evidenced by the sheer panic by most every news network and SNL.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7575061201749703300.post-1304379131765390862009-11-01T00:23:01.666-05:002009-11-01T00:23:01.666-05:00Funny thing about "lines in the sand"......Funny thing about "lines in the sand"... they have a way of shifting just like, um, sand.<br /><br />Waco was a line in the sand. And we did nothing.<br /><br />Olofson's kangaroo railroading should be a line in the sand and, so far, no one has done anything.<br /><br />So now, if the latest example of socialist arrogance passes, at last! That will be the line in the sand... the ever shifting sands of least resistance.<br /><br />It's on, it's on now, it has been on for many years, we just don't want to face up to the consequences and necessities.<br /><br />So quit drawing lines in the sand and and idly watching them crossed. <br /><br />Act on your knowledge and convictions.<br /><br />aughtsix <br /><br />IIIaughtsixnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7575061201749703300.post-69052758717063620152009-11-01T00:12:00.633-05:002009-11-01T00:12:00.633-05:00Rexxhead:
Bah. We haven't had a "two pa...Rexxhead:<br /><br />Bah. We haven't had a "two party system" for over a century. We have a one-party system: The Government Party.<br /><br />Granted, it has two branches, and every so often we go through the false ritual of deciding which of them will further our enslavement.<br /><br />That so many believe the false left/right paradigm is stunning witness to the genius of the deception.<br /><br />Certainly the Stupid branch is less onerous than the Evil one, but both are utter traitors to their oath and have been for 140+ years.<br /><br />The real difference today is that they've stopped pretending, they've abandoned all pretense of caring what the Constitution or the citizens say.<br /><br />Anonymous 10/31 @3:05 says "...Do something already" - meaningless sacrifice serves noone and will ultimately serve only to further enable the growth of their tyranny.<br /><br />Until the sheeple awaken in sufficient numbers to make victory possible, anything we may do is worse than pointless sacrifice.<br /><br />Sadly, therefore, we must wait - and pray that their chains DO NOT rest lightly upon them. Instead we must pray that they weigh so heavily as to be utterly intolerable, because only then will we find the critical mass necessary to cast them off once and for all.<br /><br />God help us...Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7575061201749703300.post-73583452946045710732009-10-31T22:29:49.769-05:002009-10-31T22:29:49.769-05:00anonymous@12.19 said "the sheeple of this cou...anonymous@12.19 said "the sheeple of this country deserve every bit of this long national nightmare for allowing obomination to come to power."<br /><br />There's plenty of blame to go around. The GOP aided and abetted the Dems by picking an indistinguishable clone of W as Obama's 'competition'. Given the choice of a party which had screwed them recently and a party which had screwed them not-so-recently, the sheeple made the rational choice.<br /><br />It's all you 'committed Republicans' who made this a race between tweedle-dee and tweedle-dum. Don't blame the sheeple.rexxheadhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12578166996312186309noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7575061201749703300.post-65564671776015005552009-10-31T18:24:30.105-05:002009-10-31T18:24:30.105-05:00well, can't exactly go throwing practicing doc...well, can't exactly go throwing practicing doctors and nurses into the harbor, can we?<br /><br />remember, these first-round drafts are not about being passed in full, but about finding just how much they can get away with.<br /><br />perhaps push them to declare the existence of a "house call loophole" that "must be closed." that might be winnable without violence. honestly, though, does anyone think avoiding violence is something they care about?<br /><br />we'll see.jonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02615104086703717817noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7575061201749703300.post-68775066569625015652009-10-31T18:21:48.393-05:002009-10-31T18:21:48.393-05:00[A]recent study, published in the Washington Post,...[A]recent study, published in the Washington Post, found that computerized records caused 28,000 medical errors and resulted in nearly three times the number of deaths as paper records.<br /><br />Who needs "Death Panels" when bureaucratic ineptitude will achieve the same results?<br /><br />MALTHUSAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7575061201749703300.post-62463034392090304922009-10-31T17:05:57.069-05:002009-10-31T17:05:57.069-05:00Blah blah blah.
Treason. Tyranny. Jam it throug...Blah blah blah.<br /><br />Treason. Tyranny. Jam it through.<br /><br />Yadda Yadda yadda.<br /><br />Do something already.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7575061201749703300.post-19339691340096859732009-10-31T16:48:40.687-05:002009-10-31T16:48:40.687-05:00These people are traitors to the Constitution and ...These people are traitors to the Constitution and thieves-in-law on a breathtaking scale.<br /><br />Their feeling of invulnerability needs to be replaced with something that'll encourage a reflection on their actions.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7575061201749703300.post-67314640681561069442009-10-31T16:28:07.872-05:002009-10-31T16:28:07.872-05:00What do we do with such a large number of criminal...What do we do with such a large number of criminals? To the gallows with them!<br /><br />Yes, it is unConstitutional which is precisely why the false state of emergency was announced, so that the Constitution can be "suspended", leaving the door open for all sorts of atrocities against the People. Ain't happenin'.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7575061201749703300.post-31752948583593740292009-10-31T16:04:12.847-05:002009-10-31T16:04:12.847-05:00[quote]
but also to exclude coverage for “dangerou...[quote]<br />but also to exclude coverage for “dangerous” activities such as hunting and keeping a gun in the house for self-defense. <br />[/quote]<br /><br />Well, that's just fine. I didn't want their "coverage" anyway. I'll just tell them I've got plenty of guns and know how to use them... and occasionally I hunt too.<br /><br />They'll just leave me alone, right? <br /><br />Molon LabeMamaLibertynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7575061201749703300.post-33669878022185754692009-10-31T15:50:17.057-05:002009-10-31T15:50:17.057-05:00"How is this less of a casus belli than the I..."How is this less of a casus belli than the Intolerable Acts?"<br /> <br />Precisely my thought, and why I forwarded it to you. I knew you would make the connection!<br /><br />The Wretched DogAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7575061201749703300.post-51292728140300729752009-10-31T14:59:07.150-05:002009-10-31T14:59:07.150-05:00the second post, from Anonymous, is right at the e...the second post, from Anonymous, is right at the edge but my guess Mike posted it to try to show the traitors in DC and the media that we have had all we are going to take. I'm sure nobody on this blog would ever wish violence on anyone but I'm also sure there are others out there, maybe a Phil Gordon, who has nothing left except his/her dignity. One other thing the traitors should consider, for the Phil Gordons out there, there are NO rules.<br /><br />Weaver IIIWeaverhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05570277329224724358noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7575061201749703300.post-14686850335892360802009-10-31T14:59:01.734-05:002009-10-31T14:59:01.734-05:00You asked, "How is this less of a casus belli...You asked, "How is this less of a casus belli than the Intolerable Acts?"<br /><br />I'll say there is no difference and I agree with poster #2 in saying this is my line in the sand. <br /><br />I do not seek a blaze of glory, <br />nor am I a soldier with combat training. I am not even a hunter, but I am educated, skilled, and armed. Perhaps I am but another like William Wallace.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7575061201749703300.post-3254683271395347972009-10-31T14:19:02.127-05:002009-10-31T14:19:02.127-05:00Frankly, the sheeple of this country deserve every...Frankly, the sheeple of this country deserve every bit of this long national nightmare for allowing obomination to come to power. Watching Hannity the other night, the level of ignorance and willing servitude demonstrated by the audience was appalling. (Of course all were from NJ) They have no clue what they are in for. <br /><br />God won't save the Republic. It isn't worth saving right nowAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7575061201749703300.post-55414738735212260982009-10-31T13:58:21.475-05:002009-10-31T13:58:21.475-05:00"Is there any labor leader, any businessman, ..."Is there any labor leader, any businessman, any lawyer or any other citizen of America so blind that he cannot see that this country is drifting at an accelerated pace into administrative absolutism similar to that which prevailed in the governments of antiquity, the governments of the Middle Ages, and in the great totalitarian governments of today? Make no mistake about it. Even as Mussolini and Hitler rose to absolute power under the forms of law … so may administrative absolutism be fastened upon this country within the Constitution and within the forms of law."<br /><br />So said Julius C. Smith, of the American Bar Association --- about the New Deal. That's how long ago this usurpation of our rights began. That's how entrenched the opposition is.<br /><br />We need a short and long view of this struggle. It's going to take a long time to win, I think, because our enemies won't just "go away."<br /><br />My quote come from:<br />http://mises.org/story/2726<br />which I read about on Western Rifle Shooters Association blog<br /><br />There is a lot more about healthcare here:<br />http://mises.org/story/3737Old Pablonoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7575061201749703300.post-15443921409743082022009-10-31T12:21:12.372-05:002009-10-31T12:21:12.372-05:00First and foremost, all those (VERY cogent and fac...First and foremost, all those (VERY cogent and factual) arguments miss the most basic point: THEY DO NOT HAVE THE CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY TO DO THIS. Period.<br /><br />Even so, it's as if this summer's rage and opposition hadn't been demonstrated at "town hall" meetings all over the country.<br /><br />It's as if every poll showed massive support for this tyranny instead of massive opposition.<br /><br />In sum, it's as if these b@stards (and biatches) don't care a fig for the Constitution or the wishes of the people, and instead are determined to jam through their agenda regardless of what we - their true, legal, Constitutional Masters - want.<br /><br />As if.<br /><br />What we're witnessing here is the thundering roar of tyranny. No longer satisfied with growing creeping fascism under cover of cynical pseudo-simpering platitudes of "public service", they've taken (RIPPED!) off the mask and exposed themselves for the monsters they truly are.<br /><br />They're not even PRETENDING any more.<br /><br />Aided by their media lap-dogs, they're no longer pretending to care what "the people" want - they're going to do what they want to do, and dare us all to do anything about it.<br /><br />There are several points I haven't seen covered: (1) Medicaid/medicare is bankrupt. (2) Union pension funds are bankrupt. This entire fiasco is about nothing more than a quid-pro-quo to their union supporters and the welfare looters.<br /><br />This power-grab will ensure that the unions are not forced to meet their obligations, instead passing them on to the taxpayer - in other words transferring billions in taxpayer funds to the people who got them elected. <br /><br />It will also bail out medicare/medicaid without forcing them to admit their abject failure to keep the promises they made in its creation and management.<br /><br />Most abhorrent is the fact that they know they lack the votes necessary to pass this through standard legal, congressional means, and thus will use an obscure procedure ("reconciliation") in order to ensure that whatever pangs of conscience (or fear of being voted out) may infect some of their number do not get in the way of their agenda. <br /><br />Still worse, their doing this will allow some 49% to claim "I voted against it" and stupid sheeple will send them right back to "the hill."<br /><br />This is MY line in the sand.<br /><br />If they do this, they have - without question - committed treason.<br /><br />Further, it is my opinion that anyone who aided and abetted this travesty -- from the TV talking-traitors to the lowliest aide -- is likewise guilty of treason.<br /><br />We all know the proper penalty for their crimes.<br /><br />God help us, and God Save Our Republic!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7575061201749703300.post-62232392632701309562009-10-31T12:18:18.437-05:002009-10-31T12:18:18.437-05:00Even "if" they somehow managed to pass t...Even "if" they somehow managed to pass this crap without starting the war, I don't understand why people are not kicking in the doors of their reps demanding that they must also agree to drop their current health coverage. Anything less proves they are in fact a class of citizen above the rest of us. <br />What do you do with such a large number of criminals?<br /><br />Weaver IIIWeaverhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05570277329224724358noreply@blogger.com